SG-C-07 | The Goh Chok Tong Years, Part I (1990-1999)

Document Code: SG-C-07 Full Title: The Goh Chok Tong Years, Part I: The Promise of a Kinder, Gentler Singapore (1990-1999) Coverage Period: 28 November 1990 -- 31 December 1999 Level Designation: Level 1 Anchor Block: C (Chronological Eras) Status: [COMPLETE] Word Count: ~9,500 Version Date: 2026-03-08

Primary Sources Consulted:

1. Peh Shing Huei, Tall Order: The Goh Chok Tong Story, Volumes 1 and 2 (Singapore: World Scientific, 2018)
2. Goh Chok Tong, National Day Rally speeches 1990--1999, National Archives of Singapore
3. Singapore Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 1990--1999; Budget Debates, Committee of Supply Debates, Ministerial Statements
4. Lee Kuan Yew, From Third World to First: The Singapore Story 1965-2000 (Singapore: Times Editions, 2000), Chapters 39--44
5. Shared Values White Paper, Cmd. 1 of 1991, Singapore Parliament
6. The Next Lap (Singapore: Government of Singapore, 1991)
7. Ministry of Trade and Industry, Economic Survey of Singapore, 1990--1999
8. Monetary Authority of Singapore, Annual Reports 1997-1998 and 1998-1999
9. The Straits Times, The Business Times, and Lianhe Zaobao, contemporaneous reporting 1990--1999
10. S. Jayakumar, Diplomacy: A Singapore Experience (Singapore: Straits Times Press, 2011)
11. Diane K. Mauzy and R.S. Milne, Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party (London: Routledge, 2002)
12. Kevin Y.L. Tan and Lam Peng Er (eds.), Managing Political Change in Singapore: The Elected Presidency (London: Routledge, 1997)
13. Garry Rodan, Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004)
14. Michael D. Barr, The Ruling Elite of Singapore: Networks of Power and Influence (London: I.B. Tauris, 2014)
15. Han Fook Kwang, Warren Fernandez, and Sumiko Tan, Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and His Ideas (Singapore: Times Editions, 1998)
16. Stephan Haggard, The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 2000)
17. Cherian George, Singapore: The Air-Conditioned Nation (Singapore: Landmark Books, 2000)
18. Singapore 21 Committee, Singapore 21: Together, We Make the Difference (Singapore: Singapore 21 Committee, 1999)
19. Sonny Yap, Richard Lim, and Leong Weng Kam, Men in White: The Untold Story of Singapore's Ruling Political Party (Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings, 2009)
20. Peh Shing Huei, Ong Teng Cheong: The Man Who Built a Nation (Singapore: Straits Times Press, 2021)

Related Documents:

• SG-B-03 | The Goh Chok Tong Transition: Promise and Reality (1990-2004)
• SG-B-07 | The Asian Financial Crisis: Why Singapore Survived (1997-1999)
• SG-C-06 | Consolidation and Crisis (1979-1990)
• SG-C-08 | The Goh Chok Tong Years, Part II (1999-2004)
• SG-E-01 | The Economic Development Board: Complete Institutional History
• SG-E-02 | The Monetary Authority of Singapore: Complete Institutional History
• SG-E-06 | The Central Provident Fund: Complete Policy History
• SG-E-12 | Fiscal Philosophy: Tax, Spend, and the Singapore Model
• SG-F-03 | Singapore and China: The Complex Bilateral
• SG-F-04 | Singapore and Malaysia: The Permanent Bilateral
• SG-G-01 | Multiracialism: The Official Doctrine, Its Architecture, and Its Limits
• SG-G-15 | The Education System: Meritocracy Machine and Its Discontents
• SG-G-20 | Civil Society and the OB Markers
• SG-H-PM-01 | Lee Kuan Yew: The Complete Governing Biography
• SG-H-PM-02 | Goh Chok Tong: Singapore's Second Prime Minister
• SG-H-OPP-02 | Chiam See Tong: The Gentleman Oppositionist
• SG-H-OPP-03 | Low Thia Khiang: The Workers' Party Rebuilder
• SG-I-03 | The Presidency: Elected, Ceremonial, or Constitutional Guardian?
• SG-J-03 | Defamation Suits: The Legal Weapon Against Opposition
• SG-J-04 | Press Freedom in Singapore
• SG-C-14 | Opposition Politics in Singapore

---

1. Key Takeaways

• The transfer of power from Lee Kuan Yew to Goh Chok Tong on 28 November 1990 was the first and most consequential leadership transition in independent Singapore's history. It answered -- conditionally -- the question of whether the Singapore system could survive the departure of its founder. The answer was conditional because the founder did not fully depart: Lee Kuan Yew remained in Cabinet as Senior Minister, with a full office, full access to government papers, and undiminished moral authority within the party and the civil service. The decade that followed was defined by the tension between the new Prime Minister's promise of a different style and the structural reality that the old Prime Minister had not left the building.

• Goh Chok Tong's pledge of a "kinder, gentler" Singapore -- more consultative, more participatory, less paternalistic -- was the defining rhetorical commitment of the 1990s. The promise was partially redeemed in tone: town hall meetings multiplied, feedback mechanisms expanded, the Nominated Member of Parliament scheme was regularised, and the hectoring style of the Lee era softened perceptibly. But the substantive instruments of PAP dominance -- control of the media, the Internal Security Act, the expanding Group Representation Constituency system, the use of defamation suits and bankruptcy proceedings against opposition politicians -- remained intact and, in several cases, were strengthened.

• The 1991 general election, held ten months after the transition, was intended to give Goh his own mandate. Instead, it delivered a shock: the PAP's vote share fell to 61 per cent, its worst result since independence, and four seats were lost to the opposition. The result was widely read as a delayed verdict on Lee Kuan Yew's later policies rather than a judgement on Goh, but it traumatised the new government and shaped the more cautious, instrumentalist approach to elections that defined the rest of the decade -- including the rise of HDB upgrading as a political lever and the deliberate expansion of GRCs.

• The Shared Values White Paper of 1991, which sought to codify a national ideology around five principles emphasising community, consensus, and family, was the Goh government's most explicit ideological initiative. It was adopted by Parliament and then largely forgotten, revealing the PAP's deep pragmatism: ideology was articulated when politically useful and abandoned when operationally unnecessary. The broader "Asian Values" debate of the mid-1990s, in which Lee Kuan Yew and Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad were the most prominent advocates, gained international attention but was effectively discredited by the Asian Financial Crisis, which exposed the governance failures of several states that had claimed Asian values as the foundation of their success.

• Ong Teng Cheong's election as Singapore's first popularly elected President in 1993, and his subsequent confrontation with the government over access to information about the national reserves, was the most significant institutional test of the decade. It demonstrated that the Elected Presidency, designed by Lee Kuan Yew as a safeguard against a "freak election result," could produce precisely the kind of friction its architects had not anticipated -- even when the President was a former PAP Deputy Prime Minister. Ong's experience revealed the fundamental tension in the Elected Presidency's design: the office was created to be a custodial check on government, but the government was unprepared for a President who actually exercised that check.

• The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-1999 was the defining economic test of the Goh era. Singapore avoided the catastrophic outcomes suffered by Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia -- no IMF bailout, no banking collapse, no currency crisis -- but it could not escape the regional downturn. GDP contracted by 1.4 per cent in 1998. The government's response -- CPF employer contribution cuts, fiscal stimulus, wage restraint, managed currency depreciation -- followed the template established during the 1985 recession and confirmed the system's capacity for rapid, coordinated economic intervention. The crisis also accelerated Lee Hsien Loong's rise, as he chaired the key economic response committees.

• The decade saw the emergence of a new generation of opposition politicians, most notably Chee Soon Juan, who brought a more confrontational, Western-influenced style of activism that challenged not just PAP policies but the PAP's rules of political engagement. The government's response -- defamation suits, bankruptcy proceedings, criminal charges for speaking without a permit -- effectively neutralised Chee as an electoral threat but created a narrative of political persecution that gained traction internationally and among younger Singaporeans.

---

2. Record in Brief

Goh Chok Tong became Singapore's second Prime Minister on 28 November 1990, inheriting a prosperous city-state with a GDP per capita approaching US$12,000, unemployment below 2 per cent, and over 85 per cent of the population housed in HDB flats. He also inherited a political system designed for and by Lee Kuan Yew: centralised, efficient, intolerant of dissent, and legitimised by performance rather than participation. Goh promised to change the style without dismantling the structure. The 1990s tested whether that was possible.

The decade began with ideological ambition. The Shared Values White Paper of January 1991 attempted to define Singaporean identity through five principles rooted in Asian communitarian thought. The "Next Lap" vision document mapped aspirations for Singapore to achieve developed-nation status. These exercises reflected genuine intellectual effort but ultimately had less policy impact than the more prosaic decisions that shaped daily governance: the introduction and subsequent raising of the Goods and Services Tax, the expansion of the GRC system, the privatisation of Singapore Telecom, and the restructuring of the education system.

The political story of the 1990s was dominated by elections and their consequences. The 1991 general election's poor result for the PAP -- 61 per cent of the vote, four seats lost -- reshaped the government's approach to electoral politics. The response included the explicit linking of HDB estate upgrading to electoral outcomes, the expansion of GRCs to make opposition contestation more difficult, and the intensification of legal action against opposition politicians. The 1997 general election, conducted in the shadow of the nascent financial crisis and the Tang Liang Hong affair, produced a recovery to 65 per cent, vindicating the strategy in the government's view and confirming the opposition's marginalisation in the critics' view.

Economically, the first half of the decade was a period of sustained growth, with GDP expanding at an average of approximately 8 per cent per annum from 1991 to 1997. Singapore crossed the developed-nation threshold, joined the OECD's Development Assistance Committee, and saw its international standing rise. The SingTel privatisation in 1993 was the first major divestment of a government-linked company and signalled a cautious embrace of market liberalisation. The Suzhou Industrial Park, launched with fanfare in 1994, became the decade's most visible failure -- a lesson in the limits of exporting Singapore's governance model abroad.

The Asian Financial Crisis, beginning in July 1997, ended the boom and tested the system under stress. Singapore's fundamentals -- massive reserves, sound banking regulation, fiscal discipline, and the MAS's credible exchange rate framework -- ensured survival, but the regional downturn inflicted real pain: GDP contracted, retrenchments rose, property prices fell sharply, and confidence was shaken. The government's response was swift and technocratically competent but also politically opportunistic: the crisis reinforced the argument that Singapore needed steady, experienced hands at the helm, which in practice meant the PAP.

By decade's end, the government was looking ahead. The Singapore 21 vision document of 1999 articulated aspirations for a more engaged citizenry, stronger community bonds, and a more distinctive national identity -- aspirations that acknowledged, without saying so directly, that the social compact was under strain and that economic performance alone might not be sufficient to sustain the PAP's legitimacy indefinitely.

---

3. Timeline of Key Events

---

4. Background and Context

The Inheritance

Goh Chok Tong did not take over a state in crisis. He took over a state that worked. By 1990, Singapore had a GDP per capita of approximately US$12,000, making it one of the wealthiest countries in Asia. Unemployment was negligible. The public housing programme had reached near-universal coverage. The SAF was a credible, well-equipped force. Foreign reserves were substantial, managed through the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) and the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The civil service was professional and largely corruption-free. Internationally, Singapore punched well above its weight in diplomacy and trade.

But the system's very success was generating new pressures. A more educated, more affluent, and more globally connected population was beginning to chafe against the paternalistic style that had characterised Lee Kuan Yew's governance. The 1984 election shock -- the PAP's vote share had dropped to 62.9 per cent, its worst result since the 1960s -- had signalled that performance legitimacy alone was insufficient. The 1987 "Marxist Conspiracy" arrests, in which 22 Catholic social workers and activists were detained under the ISA on allegations of a Marxist plot that many found implausible, had further eroded trust in the government's claims about internal security. The Graduate Mothers Scheme of 1984, which offered incentives for educated women to have more children while discouraging less-educated women from doing so, had generated visceral public anger at what was seen as social engineering taken too far.

Goh's task was therefore not merely administrative succession but a recalibration of the relationship between state and society. He needed to demonstrate that the PAP could govern differently without governing less effectively -- that consultation did not mean weakness, and that a softer style did not compromise the system's capacity for decisive action.

The Senior Minister Problem

Lee Kuan Yew's retention of the Senior Minister position created a structural ambiguity that shaped the entire decade. Lee remained in Cabinet. He maintained a full office at the Istana. He received all government papers. He met foreign leaders, sometimes without Goh's involvement. He commented publicly on policy, sometimes in ways that appeared to contradict or pre-empt the new Prime Minister's positions.

The arrangement was unprecedented. No political system had designed a formal role for a founding father who was stepping aside but not stepping out. Lee's stated rationale was that his experience and relationships -- particularly with foreign leaders who had dealt with him for decades -- were a national asset that should not be wasted. Critics argued that the Senior Minister role was a mechanism for continued control: Lee could not bear to let go, and the system he had built could not force him to.

Goh managed the relationship with a quiet discipline that has been underappreciated. He deferred to Lee on certain foreign policy matters while asserting his authority on domestic policy. He avoided public disagreements. He tolerated moments when Lee publicly second-guessed his decisions, absorbing the slight without retaliation. But the cost was real: Goh's freedom to innovate was constrained by the knowledge that any significant departure from established practice would be scrutinised by a man who had built the practice and who retained the authority to question it.

Regional Landscape: End of the Cold War and the Rise of China

The 1990s transformed the strategic environment in which Singapore operated. The end of the Cold War removed the ideological framework that had structured Southeast Asian politics since independence. The rise of China as an economic power and increasingly assertive regional actor created both opportunity and anxiety. ASEAN expanded from six to ten members, incorporating Vietnam (1995), Laos and Myanmar (1997), and Cambodia (1999), fundamentally changing the character of the organisation. The Maastricht Treaty (1992) and the acceleration of European integration provided a model -- and a cautionary tale -- for regional cooperation.

For Singapore, the most consequential shift was the deepening relationship with China and the complications it brought. Lee Kuan Yew had established a personal relationship with Deng Xiaoping, and Singapore became an important conduit for China's engagement with Southeast Asia. The Suzhou Industrial Park was the most ambitious expression of this relationship, and its difficulties foreshadowed the complexities that would define Singapore-China relations in subsequent decades.

---

5. The Primary Record

I. The Handover and the Promise: November 1990

The swearing-in ceremony at the Istana on 28 November 1990 was deliberately low-key. There was no mass rally, no flag-waving ceremony, no orchestrated display of popular enthusiasm. Goh took the oath of office before President Wee Kim Wee and proceeded to announce his Cabinet. The continuity was striking: Lee Hsien Loong remained as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry; Tony Tan continued as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence; S. Dhanabalan, S. Jayakumar, Wong Kan Seng, and other Lee-era ministers stayed in their portfolios. The message was unmistakable: this was a transition of leadership, not of direction.

But Goh's rhetoric marked a deliberate departure. In his early speeches and interviews, he articulated a vision of a more open, more consultative government. He spoke of moving from a "rugged society" to a "gracious society," of creating a "kinder, gentler" Singapore. He explicitly distanced himself from Lee's directive style, telling journalists he wanted to govern through persuasion rather than command. The "Next Lap" -- a government-commissioned report released in 1991 -- mapped aspirations for Singapore to become a fully developed nation with a vibrant economy, an engaged citizenry, and a higher quality of life. The language was aspirational, even idealistic, and it set expectations that the decade would test.

II. The Shared Values White Paper (1991)

The Shared Values White Paper, presented to Parliament on 15 January 1991, was the Goh government's first major ideological initiative. It identified five core values intended to articulate a distinctively Singaporean national identity:

1. Nation before community and society above self
2. Family as the basic unit of society
3. Community support and respect for the individual
4. Consensus, not conflict
5. Racial and religious harmony

The intellectual origins lay in Lee Kuan Yew's growing conviction that Western liberal values -- individualism, adversarial politics, personal rights over communal responsibilities -- were inappropriate for Asian societies. The White Paper was Singapore's attempt to codify this conviction in official policy, drawing on Confucian and communitarian traditions while carefully avoiding explicit identification with any single ethnic or cultural tradition.

The parliamentary debate was more substantive than most PAP-era legislative discussions. NMP Walter Woon questioned whether the values were distinctively Singaporean or merely universal aspirations. Chiam See Tong, the opposition MP for Potong Pasir, argued the exercise was an attempt to manufacture an ideology to serve PAP interests. Several Malay-Muslim MPs worried that the emphasis on "Asian values" implicitly privileged Chinese-Confucian cultural norms. The values were adopted but, characteristically, had little practical impact. They were not integrated into the education curriculum in any sustained way, did not generate institutional changes, and faded from public discourse within a few years.

The Shared Values exercise nonetheless had historical significance. It was the domestic prelude to the broader "Asian Values" debate that dominated international discourse in the mid-1990s. Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad, the two most prominent Asian Values advocates, argued that Asian societies had achieved rapid economic development precisely because they prioritised communal harmony over individual rights, social order over political freedom, and government effectiveness over procedural democracy. The argument gained traction during the economic boom years of 1993-1997 and was effectively discredited by the Asian Financial Crisis, which exposed the governance failures -- crony capitalism, opaque financial regulation, corruption -- of several states that had claimed Asian values as the foundation of their success.

III. The 1991 Election: The Mandate Denied

Goh called the general election for 31 August 1991, ten months into his premiership, seeking a fresh mandate. The PAP was confident. The economy was strong. Goh's personal approval ratings were respectable. The party expected to consolidate, perhaps to recapture ground lost in 1984 and the 1988 by-election.

The result was the PAP's worst since independence. The party won 77 of 81 seats, but its vote share fell to 61 per cent. Four opposition candidates were elected: Chiam See Tong held Potong Pasir for the Singapore Democratic Party; Low Thia Khiang won Hougang for the Workers' Party, beginning what would become a quarter-century hold on the constituency; and Ling How Doong and Cheo Chai Chen took Bukit Gombak and Nee Soon Central for the SDP.

The post-mortem was intense and shaped the rest of the decade. Three explanations emerged. The first, which Goh advanced, was the "free rider" effect: voters in safe PAP seats voted opposition because they assumed the PAP would win regardless, seeking to add opposition voices without risking a change of government. The second, more damaging to Lee Kuan Yew, was that the result was a delayed verdict on Lee-era policies -- the ISA arrests, the Graduate Mothers Scheme, the perceived arrogance of the old guard. Lee himself acknowledged that his aggressive campaigning may have been counterproductive, particularly his warning to voters in Eunos GRC that they would face consequences for voting opposition. The third explanation, advanced by some within the party, was that the consultative approach itself had been perceived as weakness, emboldening opposition voters.

The consequences were far-reaching. The PAP doubled down on the institutional advantages it had built. GRC sizes were expanded -- the maximum number of members per GRC was increased from three to six over subsequent years, making it progressively harder for opposition parties to assemble full teams of credible candidates. The linkage between electoral support and HDB estate upgrading was made explicit: constituencies that voted PAP would receive priority in upgrading programmes; those that voted opposition would wait. This was perhaps the most controversial innovation of the Goh era -- the overt use of government resources to reward loyal voters and punish disloyal ones. The government defended the practice as rational resource allocation: limited funds should go where they were supported. Critics called it electoral extortion.

IV. The Elected Presidency: Ong Teng Cheong and the Battle Over Reserves

The Elected Presidency was Lee Kuan Yew's creation -- conceived in the mid-1980s as a constitutional safeguard against a future government that might raid Singapore's accumulated reserves. The constitutional amendments, passed in 1991, gave the President two custodial powers: the power to veto drawdowns from past reserves and the power to veto key public service appointments. The President would be popularly elected, giving the office a democratic mandate independent of Parliament.

The first presidential election, held on 28 August 1993, was contested between Ong Teng Cheong -- a former Deputy Prime Minister and NTUC Secretary-General, and the PAP's endorsed candidate -- and Chua Kim Yeow, a retired senior accountant with no political base. Ong won with 58.7 per cent of the vote, a margin that was embarrassingly narrow for a PAP-endorsed candidate running against a political unknown.

What followed was the most consequential institutional confrontation of the decade. Ong took his custodial role seriously. He requested a comprehensive accounting of the government's reserves -- the total assets he was constitutionally charged with protecting. The government resisted. Officials told Ong that compiling a full inventory of state assets would take 56 man-years. The Accountant-General provided partial information. Key government-linked companies and statutory boards were reluctant to open their books to the President's office.

Ong found himself in an impossible position. He had the constitutional authority to veto reserve drawdowns but was denied the information needed to exercise that authority meaningfully. He later described his experience in a remarkable 1999 press conference -- given after he announced he would not seek a second term -- in which he said he had been "led down the garden path." He revealed that it had taken years of persistent effort to obtain even a basic listing of government assets, and that the cooperation he received was grudging at best.

The Ong Teng Cheong episode revealed a fundamental contradiction in the Elected Presidency's design. The office was created as a check on government, but the government controlled the information the President needed to exercise the check. The PAP had designed the institution to prevent a hypothetical future populist government from raiding the reserves -- it had not anticipated that the first elected President would be a former PAP insider who took the checking function seriously. The episode established a pattern: subsequent Presidents -- particularly S.R. Nathan, who succeeded Ong unopposed in 1999 -- adopted a more quiescent approach, which was more in keeping with the government's preferred interpretation of the office.

V. GST, SingTel, and the Economic Architecture

The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax on 1 April 1994, at an initial rate of 3 per cent, was one of the most consequential fiscal decisions of the Goh era. The GST broadened the tax base, reducing Singapore's dependence on direct taxes and providing a stable revenue source that would become increasingly important as the population aged and the working-age proportion shrank. The introduction was politically sensitive -- consumption taxes are inherently regressive, falling disproportionately on lower-income households -- and the government coupled it with offset packages including utility rebates and CPF top-ups for lower-income Singaporeans.

The GST rate would subsequently be raised to 4 per cent in 2003, 5 per cent in 2004, 7 per cent in 2007, and 9 per cent in two stages in 2023-2024. Each increase was politically contested, but the initial introduction under Goh established the principle that indirect taxation would play a growing role in Singapore's fiscal framework.

The partial privatisation of Singapore Telecommunications (SingTel) in 1993 was the first major divestment of a government-linked company. SingTel's initial public offering was the largest in Singapore's history at that time, and the listing was designed to broaden share ownership among Singaporeans -- every adult citizen was eligible for discounted shares. The privatisation served multiple purposes: it exposed SingTel to market disciplines, generated revenue for the government, introduced Singaporeans to equity ownership, and signalled that the government was willing to reduce its direct role in the economy. The state retained a controlling stake through Temasek Holdings, however, ensuring that strategic decisions remained under government influence.

The broader economic story of the early and mid-1990s was one of sustained boom. GDP growth averaged approximately 8 per cent per annum from 1991 to 1997. Singapore crossed the developed-nation threshold, with GDP per capita surpassing US$20,000 by the mid-1990s. The economy diversified further into financial services, logistics, and higher-value manufacturing. Foreign investment flowed in. Property prices rose sharply. The prosperity was real and broadly shared, though income inequality was beginning to widen in ways that would become a major policy concern in subsequent decades.

VI. The Suzhou Industrial Park: Ambition and Humiliation

The Suzhou Industrial Park, launched in February 1994 as a joint venture between a Singapore consortium (holding 65 per cent) and the Suzhou municipal government (35 per cent), was the most ambitious attempt to export the Singapore model abroad. The concept was Lee Kuan Yew's: Deng Xiaoping had expressed admiration for Singapore's development approach, and the SIP would be the physical embodiment of that approach -- a modern industrial township built with Singapore's expertise in planning, infrastructure, and governance.

The venture failed on its own terms. The Suzhou municipal government simultaneously developed a rival park -- the Suzhou New District -- just across town, offering land and incentives at rates that undercut the SIP. Singapore's complaints to Beijing produced sympathetic words but limited action. The Chinese partners had different incentives: the Suzhou New District was their project, controlled by local officials with their own political calculations. The SIP haemorrhaged money. Occupancy rates lagged far behind projections. The Singapore side, accustomed to an environment where government commitments were honoured and contracts enforced, found itself unable to navigate the complex, relationship-driven politics of Chinese local governance.

Lee Kuan Yew intervened personally with Chinese leaders, including Premier Zhu Rongji, but the results were mixed. In June 1999, the venture was restructured: Singapore's stake was reduced from 65 per cent to 35 per cent, and the Chinese consortium took majority control. The financial losses were significant, and the reputational damage was considerable. The SIP eventually became one of China's most successful industrial parks -- but under Chinese majority ownership, a success Singapore could claim partial credit for but did not control.

The Suzhou episode taught Singapore three lessons it did not forget: that the Singapore model was context-dependent and could not simply be transplanted; that China's governance system operated by rules that Singapore did not fully understand; and that technocratic confidence, however well-founded domestically, could become hubris abroad.

VII. Upgrading Politics and the By-Election Strategy

The 1990s saw the PAP develop two interrelated electoral strategies that critics regarded as the most innovative -- and most cynical -- forms of incumbency advantage in any nominal democracy.

The first was the explicit linking of HDB estate upgrading to electoral support. From the mid-1990s onward, the government made clear that constituencies that voted PAP would receive priority in the multi-billion-dollar programme to renovate and upgrade ageing HDB estates. Goh stated the logic openly in a 1996 National Day Rally speech: upgrading was expensive, resources were finite, and it was only rational to direct them to constituencies that had demonstrated support for the government. The opposition described this as blackmail. The government described it as accountability. Voters in opposition-held wards like Hougang and Potong Pasir waited years longer for upgrading than their counterparts in PAP-held constituencies.

The second was the "by-election strategy" -- the opposition's term for the voter tendency to support opposition candidates in single-member constituencies while voting PAP in GRCs, on the assumption that the PAP government was not at risk and that opposition representation could be added at the margin without cost. The PAP sought to close this down by expanding GRCs and reducing the number of single-member constituencies (SMCs), making it harder for the opposition to pick off individual seats. The net effect was a system in which the PAP's structural advantages -- GRC team requirements, control of electoral boundary drawing, upgrading leverage, media dominance -- made opposition inroads extremely difficult outside a handful of established opposition strongholds.

VIII. Chee Soon Juan and the New Opposition

The emergence of Chee Soon Juan in the mid-1990s marked a significant shift in the character of Singapore's opposition politics. Chee, a neuropsychology lecturer at the National University of Singapore, joined the Singapore Democratic Party in 1992 and succeeded Chiam See Tong as Secretary-General in 1993 -- a transition that was itself acrimonious, as Chiam accused Chee of engineering a takeover.

Chee brought a style of politics that was new to Singapore: confrontational, media-savvy, influenced by Western democratic activism, and willing to challenge the PAP's rules of engagement directly. He spoke without permits, held public protests, challenged ministers on the streets, and courted international media attention. His 1995 dismissal from NUS -- officially for misusing research funds, though Chee claimed political motivation -- made him a full-time opposition figure.

The government's response was comprehensive and effective. Chee was sued for defamation by Goh Chok Tong and Lee Kuan Yew -- standard practice for opposition politicians who made public statements the PAP leadership considered defamatory. He was found liable and assessed damages he could not pay, leading to bankruptcy. Under Singapore law, an undischarged bankrupt could not stand for Parliament, effectively removing Chee from electoral politics for years. He was also prosecuted for speaking in public without a permit and for selling copies of his books without a licence.

The Chee Soon Juan phenomenon raised a question that persisted throughout the decade: was Singapore's opposition weak because the political system was rigged against it, or because the opposition itself was divided, poorly resourced, and incapable of presenting a credible alternative? The honest answer involved both elements. The system's structural advantages were formidable, but the opposition's fragmentation -- the SDP split between Chiam and Chee, the Workers' Party's cautious approach under Low Thia Khiang, the multiple micro-parties with no chance of winning seats -- was also a significant factor.

IX. Defamation Suits and Media Controls

The use of defamation suits as a political weapon was not new to the Goh era -- Lee Kuan Yew had pioneered the practice -- but it became more systematised in the 1990s. The pattern was consistent: an opposition politician or foreign journalist made a statement the PAP leadership considered defamatory; lawsuits were filed; the PAP invariably won in Singapore's courts; damages were assessed at levels that were, for opposition politicians, financially devastating; and the resulting bankruptcy or impoverishment removed the target from effective political participation.

The most prominent case of the decade involved Tang Liang Hong, a lawyer who stood as a Workers' Party candidate in the January 1997 general election in Cheng San GRC. During the campaign, PAP leaders -- including Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, and several ministers -- accused Tang of being a "Chinese chauvinist" and a threat to racial harmony. Tang denied the allegations and made counter-accusations that the PAP leaders considered defamatory. Eleven separate defamation suits were filed against Tang by PAP leaders. Tang fled Singapore for Australia, claiming he feared for his safety. He was found liable in absentia and ordered to pay damages and costs totalling millions of dollars. The Inland Revenue Authority simultaneously launched tax investigations into Tang's finances.

The Tang Liang Hong affair was the most dramatic demonstration of the PAP's legal weaponry, but it was not an isolated case. J.B. Jeyaretnam, the veteran opposition politician, was also subjected to multiple defamation suits and was ultimately bankrupted and disbarred. The cumulative effect was to create what critics called a "chilling effect": potential opposition politicians understood that entering the arena meant accepting the risk of financial ruin.

Media controls were tightened during the 1990s as well. The Newspaper and Printing Presses Act, which gave the government power to approve board appointments at newspaper companies, ensured that the domestic press remained compliant. Foreign publications that published articles the government considered inaccurate or biased -- the Far Eastern Economic Review, The Economist, Asiaweek, the International Herald Tribune -- faced restrictions on their circulation in Singapore or were required to publish government responses. The Far Eastern Economic Review and the International Herald Tribune were both involved in protracted legal disputes with the government during the decade. The pattern was consistent: Singapore's libel laws, applied by courts that invariably found for the government, served as an effective mechanism for controlling both domestic and foreign media.

X. The Asian Financial Crisis: Test and Survival (1997-1999)

The Thai baht's collapse on 2 July 1997 triggered a contagion that swept through East and Southeast Asia with devastating effect. Indonesia's GDP fell by approximately 13 per cent, triggering the fall of Suharto. Thailand's GDP contracted by 10.5 per cent. South Korea required a US$57 billion IMF bailout. Malaysia imposed capital controls and Prime Minister Mahathir blamed foreign speculators. The Philippines endured a deep recession. The crisis discredited the "Asian miracle" narrative and -- for those who had advanced it -- the Asian Values argument.

Singapore's structural advantages insulated it from the worst. Official foreign reserves of approximately US$75 billion by mid-1997, combined with far larger reserves managed by GIC, meant there was no question of a currency collapse or a sovereign debt crisis. The MAS's exchange rate framework -- a managed float within an undisclosed policy band, centred on the nominal effective exchange rate rather than a fixed peg to the US dollar -- allowed an orderly depreciation of approximately 15-17 per cent against the US dollar, improving competitiveness without triggering panic. The banking system, regulated more conservatively than those of Thailand or Indonesia, had minimal exposure to the speculative property and equity lending that had devastated banking sectors elsewhere.

But Singapore could not escape entirely. As a small, open economy deeply integrated with the region, it was hit by falling demand from crisis-affected neighbours, a decline in investment flows, a sharp contraction in tourism, and collapsing confidence. GDP growth slowed from 8.3 per cent in 1997 to a contraction of 1.4 per cent in 1998. The Straits Times Index fell by approximately 60 per cent from its 1996 peak. Property prices declined by 40 per cent. Retrenchments rose to levels not seen since the 1985 recession.

The government's response replicated the 1985 template, adapted and expanded. The centrepiece was the off-budget Cost-Cutting Package announced on 24 November 1998 by Finance Minister Richard Hu. Employer CPF contribution rates were cut from 20 per cent to 10 per cent, providing immediate cost relief to businesses estimated at S$2.1 billion per annum. Government rents for industrial and commercial properties were reduced by 10 per cent. Foreign worker levies were cut. Utility charges were reduced. A fiscal stimulus package directed spending to infrastructure and public works. The National Wages Council recommended wage restraint, and the NTUC cooperated in moderating wage demands.

Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong chaired the Committee on Singapore's Competitiveness, which was the operational centre of the crisis response. His prominence during the crisis -- decisive, technically competent, visibly in command -- further consolidated his position as Goh's inevitable successor. The crisis response worked: GDP recovered to growth of 7.2 per cent in 1999, unemployment fell back, and the banking system emerged unscathed. But the crisis also exposed Singapore's vulnerability to regional economic shocks and reinforced the government's conviction that massive reserves, conservative regulation, and the capacity for rapid, coordinated intervention were not merely prudent but existentially necessary.

XI. Singapore 21 and Education Reforms

The Singapore 21 vision document, released in 1999 after extensive public consultation, represented the Goh government's most systematic attempt to articulate a social vision beyond economic growth. The document identified five key ideals: "Every Singaporean Matters," "Strong Families," "Opportunities for All," "The Singapore Heartbeat" (national identity), and "Active Citizens." It was the product of a committee chaired by several ministers and involving thousands of public submissions.

Singapore 21 acknowledged, in carefully hedged language, that Singapore faced a social and existential challenge that economic prosperity alone could not resolve. Emigration was rising, particularly among the professional class. Younger Singaporeans expressed ambivalence about national identity and a sense that life in Singapore was materially comfortable but spiritually constraining. The document sought to respond by promising more space for civic engagement, stronger community bonds, and a national identity rooted in values rather than merely in prosperity.

In parallel, the education system underwent significant reform during the 1990s. Goh's 1997 articulation of the "Thinking Schools, Learning Nation" (TSLN) vision marked a deliberate shift from rote-learning and examination-focused pedagogy toward critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. The reforms included the introduction of project work, a reduction in curriculum content, greater emphasis on information technology in education, and the establishment of new specialised schools (including the School of the Arts and the Singapore Sports School, though both opened after 2000). The National Institute of Education was restructured to improve teacher training.

The education reforms reflected a genuine recognition that Singapore's economic model was shifting from labour-intensive manufacturing to knowledge-intensive services, and that the education system needed to produce different kinds of graduates -- more creative, more entrepreneurial, more adaptable. But the reforms also collided with deeply entrenched cultural expectations about academic achievement and examination results, and their implementation was incremental rather than transformative.

---

6. Key Figures

---

7. Stories, Anecdotes, and the Human Record

Anecdote 1: "I Am Not the Interim Prime Minister"

The perception that Goh Chok Tong was a placeholder -- that his premiership was a transitional phase between Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong -- was the most persistent and most wounding narrative of his tenure. Goh was acutely aware of it. In Tall Order, his authorised biography by Peh Shing Huei, Goh revealed that the label "interim PM" had troubled him throughout his time in office. He addressed it publicly on several occasions, once stating bluntly: "I am not the interim Prime Minister."

The difficulty was that the perception had a basis in structural reality. Lee Hsien Loong had been Deputy Prime Minister since Goh took office in 1990. He was twenty years younger than Goh. He accumulated increasingly important portfolios. His role during the Asian Financial Crisis made his eventual succession a foregone conclusion. Goh managed this situation with dignity, never publicly expressing resentment, but the cost to his authority was real. Foreign leaders, civil servants, and even PAP MPs sometimes looked past Goh to the man they assumed would be the next Prime Minister.

Source: Peh Shing Huei, Tall Order, Vol. 1, Chapters 1 and 8.

Anecdote 2: Ong Teng Cheong's Press Conference

On the eve of his departure from the presidency in August 1999, Ong Teng Cheong held a press conference that stunned political Singapore. Speaking with a candour that was extraordinary by the standards of Singapore's political culture, Ong described his struggles to obtain basic information about the government's reserves. He recounted being told that a comprehensive accounting would take 56 man-years. He described being given a two-page summary rather than the detailed breakdown he had requested. He said he had been "led down the garden path."

The press conference was remarkable not for what it revealed about the reserves -- the specific figures were less important than the principle -- but for what it revealed about the Elected Presidency as an institution. Here was a former Deputy Prime Minister, a lifelong PAP member, a man who had served the party at the highest levels, declaring publicly that the government had obstructed him in the exercise of his constitutional duties. If the PAP's own man could not make the Elected Presidency work as intended, what chance would an outsider have?

Ong Teng Cheong died of cancer on 8 February 2002. The government accorded him a state funeral, but the relationship between Ong and the Cabinet he had challenged remained strained to the end.

Source: Ong Teng Cheong press conference transcript, August 1999; Peh Shing Huei, Ong Teng Cheong: The Man Who Built a Nation (2021); Kevin Y.L. Tan and Lam Peng Er, Managing Political Change in Singapore: The Elected Presidency.

Anecdote 3: The Michael Fay Caning

In March 1994, Michael Fay, an 18-year-old American living in Singapore, was arrested for vandalism -- spray-painting cars -- and sentenced to six strokes of the cane, a fine, and imprisonment. The case became an international sensation. US President Bill Clinton appealed for clemency, as did many American media outlets. Singapore's response was firm: Goh Chok Tong reduced the sentence from six strokes to four as a gesture of goodwill toward the United States, but refused to eliminate the caning entirely.

The episode became a proxy for the Asian Values debate. Singapore's defenders argued that the caning reflected a legitimate legal system that prioritised social order and deterrence over individual comfort, and that American outrage reflected cultural imperialism. Critics argued that caning was a form of torture incompatible with international human rights norms. For a few weeks, Singapore was the most-discussed country in American media -- not for its economic achievements but for its criminal justice system. The episode illustrated a recurring pattern: Singapore's international image was shaped at least as much by moments of cultural collision as by its development record.

Source: The Straits Times, March-May 1994; contemporaneous reporting in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Time magazine.

Anecdote 4: The HDB Upgrading Ultimatum

In his 1996 National Day Rally speech, Goh Chok Tong made explicit what had been implicit in PAP electoral strategy: that HDB estate upgrading would be linked to voting patterns. He told Singaporeans that resources were limited and would be directed to constituencies that supported the government. "If you don't support the government," he said, in effect, "you will have to wait for your upgrading."

The response was polarised. PAP supporters argued that this was merely rational resource allocation. Opposition supporters -- particularly in Hougang and Potong Pasir, where residents watched neighbouring PAP wards receive upgraded lifts, corridors, and covered walkways while their own estates remained untouched -- saw it as political punishment. The upgrading issue became a symbol of the PAP's willingness to use the power of the state to maintain electoral dominance. It was effective: the threat of delayed upgrading was widely credited as a factor in the PAP's improved performance in the 1997 election.

Source: National Day Rally speech, 1996; The Straits Times, contemporaneous reporting; Diane K. Mauzy and R.S. Milne, Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party, Chapter 7.

---

8. The Arguments and the Rhetoric

The Government's Position: Consultation Within Limits

The Goh government's rhetorical framework was built on two propositions that existed in tension with each other. The first was that Singapore was ready for a more open, more consultative style of governance -- that the population had matured, that the economy was strong enough to absorb dissent, and that the legitimacy of the system depended on evolving beyond the founder's directive approach. The second was that the fundamental structure of the PAP system -- one-party dominance, controlled media, limited political space for opposition -- remained essential to Singapore's stability and prosperity.

Goh articulated this tension more honestly than most leaders would have. He acknowledged that his consultative promise had limits. He was open about the fact that the government would decide which issues were open for public input and which were not. He defended defamation suits, GRC expansion, and upgrading politics as necessary features of the system, not as departures from democratic norms. The argument, in essence, was that Singapore's democracy was genuine but different -- calibrated for a small, multiracial, resource-scarce society that could not afford the instability that adversarial Western-style politics might produce.

The Opposition's Position: Structural Rigging

The opposition argued that the PAP's "consultation" was a performance -- that the system was designed to produce the appearance of participation without the reality of contestation. The GRC system made it nearly impossible for opposition parties to win seats. The defamation-suit regime bankrupted politicians who challenged the PAP. The controlled media denied opposition parties access to the electorate. The upgrading leverage punished voters who exercised their right to choose. And the Senior Minister's continued presence in Cabinet ensured that the real power structure had not changed at all.

Chiam See Tong, the gentlest of the opposition voices, argued within the system, accepting its rules while seeking incremental change. Chee Soon Juan challenged the rules themselves, arguing that Singapore's political system was not a flawed democracy but an authoritarian state with democratic trappings. Low Thia Khiang, the most strategically astute opposition politician of the decade, said little publicly but began the slow, patient process of building the Workers' Party into a credible institution -- a project that would bear fruit only in the following decade.

The International Debate: Asian Values

The Asian Values debate of the mid-1990s was, at its core, an argument about whether the Western model of liberal democracy was universal or culturally specific. Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad argued the latter: that Asian societies had their own traditions of governance, rooted in Confucian, Islamic, and communitarian values, that produced effective government without Western-style individual rights. The argument found a receptive audience during the boom years, when Asia's economic growth rates dwarfed the West's and it was plausible to claim that Asian governance models were not merely different but superior.

The Asian Financial Crisis devastated this argument. The governance failures exposed by the crisis -- Indonesia's crony capitalism, Thailand's speculative banking practices, South Korea's chaebol-government nexus, Malaysia's politically directed lending -- were precisely the kinds of failures that transparency, accountability, and the rule of law were supposed to prevent. The countries that weathered the crisis best -- Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan -- were those with the strongest regulatory frameworks and the most transparent governance, not those with the most assertive Asian Values rhetoric. The irony was not lost on critics: the Asian Values argument had been used to defend the very practices -- opacity, patronage, concentrated power -- that had caused the crisis.

---

9. The Contested Record

Was the Consultative Turn Genuine?

The central debate of the Goh era concerns the sincerity and significance of the consultative turn. Defenders argue that the shift was real: town hall meetings, NMPs, Government Parliamentary Committees, feedback mechanisms, and a genuinely softer rhetorical tone created meaningful new channels for public input. The Shared Values exercise, the Singapore 21 process, and the various public consultation exercises on specific policies represented a genuine effort to incorporate public sentiment into governance.

Critics argue that the consultation was performative -- that the channels created were designed to absorb and diffuse public sentiment rather than to genuinely alter policy outcomes. The issues that mattered most to the political system -- electoral rules, media control, the ISA, the use of defamation suits -- were never subject to genuine public consultation. The government retained the power to define the "OB markers" (out-of-bounds markers) that determined which topics were open for public discussion and which were not. When consultation produced results the government did not want, the results were ignored.

Did the GRC Expansion Constitute Gerrymandering?

The government maintained that the GRC system was designed to ensure minority racial representation in Parliament -- that without the requirement to include at least one minority-race candidate in each GRC team, Singapore's Chinese-majority electorate might fail to elect adequate numbers of Malay, Indian, and Eurasian MPs. Critics argued that minority representation was a pretext: the system's primary effect was to raise the barrier to opposition entry so high that only the most well-resourced and well-organised opposition parties could compete. The expansion of GRC sizes from three members to five and six members during the 1990s -- which had no obvious relationship to minority representation -- supported the critics' interpretation.

Was the Government's Treatment of Ong Teng Cheong Justified?

The government's position on Ong Teng Cheong's requests for reserve information was that the President did not need a comprehensive accounting to exercise his veto power -- he needed only to know when a proposed drawdown exceeded the reserves accumulated by the current government. Ong argued that he could not meaningfully exercise his custodial role without knowing the total quantum of reserves he was protecting. The legal question -- what information the President was constitutionally entitled to -- was never fully resolved. The political question -- whether the government deliberately obstructed a President exercising his constitutional duties -- remains contested, though Ong's own account, delivered in his 1999 press conference, strongly implies that obstruction occurred.

Were the Defamation Suits Political Persecution or Legitimate Legal Action?

The government consistently argued that defamation suits were filed to protect the personal reputations of ministers and political leaders -- that the suits were private actions, not state persecution, and that anyone who made false and defamatory statements should expect legal consequences. Critics pointed to the pattern: suits were filed almost exclusively by PAP leaders against opposition politicians or critical journalists; they were adjudicated by a judiciary that had never ruled against the PAP in a political defamation case; and the damages assessed were calibrated to ensure financial ruin. The International Bar Association, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the International Commission of Jurists all raised concerns about the use of defamation law as a political weapon.

Did Upgrading Politics Cross an Ethical Line?

The explicit linking of HDB upgrading to electoral outcomes was defended by the government as rational resource allocation and attacked by critics as electoral corruption. The question turns on whether a democratic government is entitled to direct discretionary spending toward supporters. Most democracies engage in some version of this practice -- pork-barrel politics, earmarks, constituency development funds. What distinguished Singapore's version was its explicitness: the government did not disguise or deny the linkage but stated it openly as official policy. Whether this transparency made the practice more honest or more coercive remains a matter of perspective.

---

10. Outcomes, Impact, and the Evidence

Economic Indicators

Electoral Indicators

Key Structural Changes

• GRC maximum size expanded from 3 members (1988) to 6 members (by 1997)
• Number of SMCs reduced, increasing proportion of seats contested as GRCs
• GST introduced (1994) at 3%, establishing indirect taxation as a permanent fiscal instrument
• SingTel partially privatised (1993), establishing the model for subsequent GLC divestments
• Elected Presidency implemented (1991) and first tested (1993-1999)
• CPF employer contribution rate: cut from 20% to 10% during AFC (1999), from a peak of 25% before the 1985 recession

Social and Institutional Changes

• Shared Values White Paper adopted (1991) but not systematically implemented
• Maintenance of Parents Act (1992) -- legal codification of filial piety
• "Thinking Schools, Learning Nation" education reform launched (1997)
• Singapore 21 vision document released (1999)
• Speakers' Corner at Hong Lim Park announced (1999, operational 2000)
• NMP scheme regularised and expanded

---

11. What the Archive Still Hides

Cabinet Minutes and Deliberations: The internal records of Cabinet discussions during the Goh era remain classified. Key decisions -- the precise deliberations over the GST introduction, the internal debate over the Suzhou Industrial Park's future, the discussions about how to handle Ong Teng Cheong's reserve requests, the strategic calculations behind defamation suits -- are known only through retrospective accounts and authorised biographies, which are necessarily selective.

Ong Teng Cheong's Presidential Records: The full correspondence between President Ong Teng Cheong and the government regarding the reserves -- the letters, the responses, the legal opinions sought, the internal government discussions about how much information to provide -- has never been published. Ong's 1999 press conference provided a partial account, but the documentary record that would allow a comprehensive assessment of whether the government acted in good faith remains inaccessible.

The Senior Minister's Actual Influence: The precise mechanisms through which Lee Kuan Yew exerted influence as Senior Minister -- which policy decisions he influenced, which he vetoed informally, which he initiated -- cannot be fully reconstructed from public sources. Peh Shing Huei's Tall Order and Han Fook Kwang's Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and His Ideas provide glimpses, but the full picture of the Lee-Goh power dynamic during the 1990s remains opaque.

Electoral Boundary Drawing: The process by which the Elections Department drew and redrew constituency boundaries -- particularly the decisions about GRC composition, size, and configuration -- has never been subjected to independent scrutiny. The government maintains that boundary decisions are made by an independent committee, but the committee's deliberations are not published, and the outcomes have consistently favoured the PAP.

The Suzhou Industrial Park's Full Financial Record: The total financial losses incurred by the Singapore consortium in the Suzhou Industrial Park have never been publicly disclosed. The restructuring in 1999 involved a reduction in Singapore's stake, but the cumulative investment losses, the write-downs, and the final financial settlement between the Singapore and Chinese partners remain unclear.

Intelligence and Security Operations: The Internal Security Department's activities during the 1990s -- surveillance of opposition politicians, monitoring of civil society organisations, intelligence assessments of political risks -- remain classified. The extent to which ISD assessments influenced the government's political calculations -- including decisions about defamation suits, electoral strategy, and media controls -- is unknown.

The Defamation Suits' Internal Calculus: Whether defamation suits against opposition politicians were genuine responses to perceived defamation or calculated political operations directed from the top of the PAP leadership is a question the archival record has not answered. The consistency of the pattern -- suits filed by multiple PAP leaders simultaneously, legal representation by the same firms, damages assessed at similar levels -- suggests coordination, but the documentary evidence of how these decisions were made has not been released.

---

12. Spiral Index

The following documents should exist within the Singapore Governance Knowledge Corpus to provide full coverage of the topics addressed in this document:

---

Document compiled for the Singapore Governance Knowledge Corpus. This document synthesises published primary sources, authorised biographies, academic histories, and contemporaneous reporting. It does not draw on classified or restricted materials. All interpretive claims are attributed or flagged as contested where appropriate. Readers seeking the official government account should consult Goh Chok Tong's speeches and Peh Shing Huei's Tall Order; readers seeking critical perspectives should consult the works of Garry Rodan, Cherian George, Michael Barr, and the contributors to the volumes on Singapore's opposition and civil society.