SG-H-THINK-03 | Tommy Koh — The Great Negotiator: Singapore's Conscience-in-Residence

Document Code: SG-H-THINK-03 Full Title: Tommy Koh Thong Bee — The Great Negotiator, Pragmatic Idealist, and Singapore's Most Outspoken Establishment Intellectual: An Exhaustive Intellectual Profile Coverage Period: 1937--present Level Designation: Intellectual Profile Primary Sources Consulted:

1. Tommy Koh, The Quest for World Order: Perspectives of a Pragmatic Idealist (Singapore: Times Academic Press, 1998; co-edited with Amitav Acharya)
2. Tommy Koh, The Tommy Koh Reader: Favourite Essays and Lectures (Singapore: World Scientific, 2013)
3. Tommy Koh, The Making of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea -- various published lectures and reflections
4. Tommy Koh, Building a New Legal Order for the Oceans (Singapore: NUS Press, 2020)
5. Tommy Koh (ed.), Fifty Secrets of Singapore's Success (Singapore: Straits Times Press, 2020)
6. Tommy Koh and Li Lin Chang (eds.), The United States--Singapore Free Trade Agreement: Highlights and Insights (Singapore: World Scientific, 2004)
7. Tommy Koh and Li Lin Chang (eds.), The Little Red Dot: Reflections by Singapore's Diplomats (Vols. 1--3, Singapore: World Scientific, 2005--2015)
8. Tommy Koh and Hernaikh Singh (eds.), India On Our Minds: Essays By Tharman Shanmugaratnam And 50 Singaporean Friends Of India (Singapore: World Scientific, 2021)
9. Tommy Koh, Lin Heng Lye, and Shawn Lum (eds.), Peace with Nature: 50 Inspiring Essays on Nature and the Environment (Singapore: World Scientific, 2023)
10. Tommy Koh, My Journey of Peace to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Russia (Singapore: World Scientific, 2024)
11. Tommy Koh, Tommy Koh: The Extraordinary Life of an Ordinary Man (Singapore: World Scientific, 2025)
12. S. Jayakumar and Tommy Koh, Pedra Branca: The Road to the World Court (Singapore: NUS Press, 2009)
13. Lay Hwee Yeo, Peggy Peck Gee Kek, and Gillian Koh (eds.), Tommy Koh: Serving Singapore and the World (Singapore: World Scientific, 2017)
14. Tommy Koh, "Five Tests That Singaporeans Must Pass to Be a Truly First World People," The Straits Times, December 2019
15. Tommy Koh, "China's Perception of Singapore: 4 Areas of Misunderstanding," The Straits Times, October 2016
16. Tommy Koh, "Is Singapore a Small Country?", The Straits Times / Tembusu College, 2017
17. Tommy Koh, "My Birthday Wishes for Singapore," The Straits Times, August 2019
18. Tommy Koh, Facebook posts on inequality, minimum wage, and Straits Times media coverage, October 2018
19. Transcript, DPM Tharman Shanmugaratnam and Ambassador Tommy Koh dialogue, IPS 30th Anniversary Conference, October 2018
20. Tommy Koh, remarks at Singapore Bicentennial Conference, Institute of Policy Studies, 1 October 2019
21. Tommy Koh, CNA "Heart of the Matter" podcast interview, August 2022
22. Harvard Business Review, "A Great Negotiator's Essential Advice," July 2014
23. Program on Negotiation, Harvard Law School, "Five Fundamentals of Negotiation from Great Negotiator Tommy Koh," 2014
24. Chandler Institute of Governance, "Governance Matters: The Great Negotiator" (interview with Tommy Koh)
25. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, Lecture Series: Ambassador Tommy Koh
26. National Library Board Singapore, Infopedia entry on Tommy Koh
27. Various Mothership.SG, The Independent Singapore, The Online Citizen, and The Straits Times articles cited throughout

Related Documents:

• SG-H-THINK-01 | Kishore Mahbubani (contemporary; different intellectual disposition)
• SG-H-THINK-02 | Bilahari Kausikan (contemporary; significant public disagreements)
• SG-H-THINK-05 | Lim Siong Guan (contemporary; civil service perspective)
• SG-H-CS-14 | Ngiam Tong Dow (contemporary outspoken establishment critic)
• SG-H-PM-01 | Lee Kuan Yew (political principal)
• SG-H-MIN-46 | Dr Tan Eng Liang — RI classmate, NUS faculty colleague, Raffles Hall co-Resident-Fellow, lifelong friend; the Simple Beginnings (2016) book launch and the 21 February 2026 Facebook reminiscence are the two most extended Koh statements of personal friendship-and-character on the public record

Version Date: 2026-04-26

---

Part I: The Man and His Formation

1.1 Origins and Early Life

Tommy Koh Thong Bee was born on 12 November 1937 in Singapore, then a British Crown Colony. He would grow up to become one of the most consequential diplomats in Singapore's history -- and, unusually for a figure so deeply embedded in the establishment, one of its most persistent and candid internal critics on matters of social justice, culture, and civic life.

Unlike many of Singapore's founding-generation leaders who came from wealthy or politically prominent families, Koh's background was modest. The details of his childhood and family circumstances are not extensively recorded in public sources, but what is clear is that his trajectory was propelled by academic brilliance. He was, by his own account, an "accidental diplomat" -- a man who intended to be a law professor and found himself drawn into diplomatic service by the needs of a newly independent nation that had precious few trained professionals to staff its foreign service.

1.2 Education

Koh's academic record was extraordinary from the outset. He earned a Bachelor of Laws degree with First Class Honours from the University of Singapore in 1961 -- the first law student in the university's history to achieve this distinction. After completing his degree, he undertook his pupillage under David Marshall, Singapore's first Chief Minister and one of the most celebrated criminal defence lawyers in the country's history. Marshall was a flamboyant, eloquent, fiercely independent-minded advocate -- a man who had challenged the British colonial government, who had championed civil liberties, and who brought both theatrical flair and genuine moral conviction to the practice of law. Koh later remembered Marshall as "a gifted teacher" who "brought both learning and enthusiasm to his classes" and was "truly an unforgettable person."

The Marshall influence is worth noting. Marshall was not a conformist. He was a man who spoke truth to power, who believed in the dignity of the individual, and who was willing to pay political costs for his convictions. These qualities would later surface, in a more measured and diplomatic register, in Koh's own career -- particularly his willingness, unusual among Singapore's establishment figures, to publicly criticise government policies on social inequality, arts funding, migrant worker treatment, and civic culture.

Koh was admitted to the Singapore Bar as an advocate and solicitor in 1962. He served as an assistant lecturer in the Faculty of Law at the University of Singapore from 1962 to 1964, before leaving for Harvard Law School on a Fulbright fellowship, where he obtained his Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree in 1964. He was the first Singaporean to study at Harvard Law School. He later completed a postgraduate diploma in criminology at Cambridge University in 1965.

Returning to Singapore, Koh resumed his academic career at the University of Singapore's Faculty of Law. By 1971, at the age of 33, he had been awarded tenure and promoted to Dean of the Faculty of Law -- a position he held until 1974. He was conferred a full professorship in 1977 and remains, to this day, a professor at what is now the National University of Singapore's Faculty of Law.

1.3 The Accidental Diplomat

In 1968, at the age of 31, Koh was appointed Singapore's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York. The appointment made him the youngest ambassador in the history of the United Nations -- a distinction that reflected not only his personal capabilities but the desperate shortage of qualified diplomatic personnel in a nation that was barely three years old. Singapore had been expelled from Malaysia in 1965 and was scrambling to build the institutions of a viable state from almost nothing. Young, brilliant professionals like Koh were pressed into service wherever they were needed, regardless of their original career plans.

Koh has described himself as an "accidental diplomat" who had intended to be a law professor. Instead, he found himself inextricably tied to his country's foreign policy for the better part of six decades. This self-description -- the "accidental" nature of his diplomatic career -- is characteristic of a certain intellectual humility, but it should not obscure the fact that Koh brought to diplomacy a set of qualities that made him unusually effective: legal precision, an academic's commitment to mastering the substance of issues, a capacity for patient consensus-building, and -- perhaps most importantly -- a genuine belief that international law and multilateral institutions could serve as the foundation for a more just world order.

---

Part II: The Diplomatic Career -- A Chronological Record

2.1 First UN Posting (1968--1971)

Koh's first posting as Singapore's Permanent Representative to the United Nations lasted from 1968 to 1971. During this period, he represented a newly independent city-state that was fighting for recognition and survival. The experience shaped his lifelong conviction that international law is, for small states, "both a shield and a sword" -- a phrase he has used repeatedly throughout his career. For a country without military power or strategic depth, the rules-based international order was not an abstraction but a matter of existential importance.

2.2 Dean of Law (1971--1974)

Between his two UN postings, Koh returned to academia as Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Singapore from 1971 to 1974. This period is less well-documented in public sources, but it established Koh's academic credentials and his standing within Singapore's legal community.

2.3 Second UN Posting and UNCLOS Presidency (1974--1984)

Koh returned to New York as Singapore's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in 1974 and served until 1984 -- a decade-long posting that would include the most consequential achievement of his diplomatic career: the presidency of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III).

2.3.1 UNCLOS III: The Defining Achievement

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is often described as the "constitution for the oceans." It established the legal framework governing the use of the world's seas and oceans, including exclusive economic zones (EEZs) extending 200 nautical miles from baselines, the continental shelf regime, the deep seabed mining regime, freedom of navigation, and the settlement of maritime disputes. It is one of the most comprehensive and ambitious multilateral treaties ever negotiated, involving more than 160 states over a period of nine years (1973--1982).

Koh became President of UNCLOS III in its most critical phase, from 1981 to 1982, succeeding Hamilton Shirley Amerasinghe of Sri Lanka, who died in office. Koh had previously served as chairman of the Main Committee. His elevation to the presidency placed him at the helm of the negotiations at a moment of acute crisis: the Reagan administration in the United States had withdrawn its support for the draft convention, particularly its provisions on deep seabed mining, threatening to derail the entire enterprise.

Koh's achievement was to guide the conference to the adoption of the Convention on 30 April 1982, with 130 votes in favour and only 4 against, with 17 abstentions. The Convention was subsequently opened for signature at Montego Bay, Jamaica, on 10 December 1982. The United States voted against, but the overwhelming consensus that Koh built ensured that the Convention would become the foundational legal instrument for ocean governance.

The significance of this achievement for Singapore specifically cannot be overstated. As a small island state whose prosperity depended entirely on freedom of navigation, access to shipping lanes, and the rule of law at sea, Singapore had an existential interest in a comprehensive, rules-based legal order for the oceans. The Convention's provisions on innocent passage, transit through straits, and the delimitation of maritime boundaries all served Singapore's core interests by constraining the unilateral territorial claims of larger states and establishing a framework within which disputes could be resolved through law rather than force.

Harvard's Program on Negotiation, in awarding Koh the Great Negotiator Award in 2014, noted that he had "played central roles in some of the most complex international negotiations ever held." The UNCLOS presidency was the centrepiece of this assessment.

2.3.2 Koh's Negotiating Philosophy at UNCLOS

Koh brought to UNCLOS a distinctive approach to multilateral negotiation that he would later articulate in his writings and lectures. His core principles included:

Mastering the brief. Koh insisted that effective negotiation begins with thorough preparation. The negotiator must know the facts, the law, the interests of all parties, and the range of possible outcomes. At UNCLOS, this meant mastering an extraordinarily complex body of technical material -- from marine geology to fisheries science to deep seabed mining technology.

Building a common fact base. One of the structural problems in multilateral negotiations is that different delegations operate from different factual assumptions. Koh worked to establish shared factual foundations, reducing the scope for disagreement based on misinformation.

Miniaturising negotiations. In a conference with more than 160 participating states, progress is impossible in plenary sessions where every delegation must speak. Koh pioneered the technique of selecting small, carefully chosen subgroups to work on specific issues, then strategically expanding the circle as consensus emerged. This technique -- what he later called "miniaturising" -- allowed him to break through impasses that the full conference could not resolve.

Thinking win-win. Koh rejected the zero-sum mentality that characterised much Cold War-era diplomacy. He insisted that effective negotiation required creating value, not merely claiming it, and that durable agreements must satisfy the core interests of all major parties.

Cultural intelligence. Beyond analytical and emotional intelligence, Koh emphasised the importance of "thinking outside your own cultural box" -- understanding how negotiating partners from different cultural backgrounds perceive problems, process information, and respond to proposals.

The "education" function. In complex multiparty negotiations, Koh argued, the chairman must serve not merely as a facilitator but as an educator -- helping delegations understand the issues, the constraints, and the consequences of various outcomes.

Koh described negotiation as both an "art and a science" -- a formulation that captures his belief that technical mastery of substance must be combined with the interpersonal skills, cultural sensitivity, and creative imagination that cannot be reduced to formulae.

2.4 Ambassador to the United States (1984--1990)

From 1984 to 1990, Koh served as Singapore's Ambassador to the United States of America, concurrently accredited as High Commissioner to Canada and Ambassador to Mexico. This posting placed him at the centre of Singapore's most important bilateral relationship during a period of significant economic and strategic change. The experience deepened his understanding of American politics, institutions, and negotiating culture -- knowledge that would prove invaluable when he later served as chief negotiator for the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement.

2.5 Ambassador-at-Large (1990--Present)

In 1990, Koh was appointed Ambassador-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs -- a position he has held continuously for more than three decades. The title is unusual and, in Singapore's context, unique. It means that Koh is not accredited to any particular country but is available to the government for special diplomatic assignments, negotiations, and representation at the highest level. It is, in effect, a recognition that Koh's value to Singapore's foreign policy transcends any single posting or bilateral relationship.

The Ambassador-at-Large position has allowed Koh to serve as a roving diplomatic troubleshooter, chief negotiator, and public intellectual simultaneously -- a combination of roles that is rare in any country's diplomatic service and that reflects the distinctive nature of Singapore's governance model, in which a small elite of highly capable individuals is expected to serve across multiple domains.

---

Part III: Major Diplomatic and Legal Achievements

3.1 The Rio Earth Summit (1992)

After completing his term as Ambassador to the United States, Koh was appointed Chairman of the Preparatory Committee and the Main Committee for the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), known as the Rio Earth Summit. This was one of the most significant international conferences of the twentieth century, attended by 172 governments and producing landmark agreements including the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Agenda 21, and the Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Koh's role at Rio was analogous to his role at UNCLOS: he was the chairman who had to build consensus among deeply divided camps. The North-South divide was at the heart of the Rio negotiations. Developed countries wanted binding environmental commitments; developing countries argued that environmental protection could not come at the expense of economic development, and that the developed world bore primary responsibility for environmental degradation.

Koh's achievement was to forge the concept of "sustainable development" as the unifying framework -- a reconciliation between the environmental and development camps that had previously been seen as irreconcilable. As Koh later reflected: "Until the Earth Summit, there was no meeting of minds between those who champion the environment and those who champion economic development. In Rio, we managed to bring about a reconciliation between the two camps, with the unifying concept of sustainable development."

Koh also broke new ground at Rio by allowing non-governmental organisations to participate in the conference proceedings for the first time in UN conference history. This was a radical departure from the state-centric tradition of UN diplomacy, and it reflected Koh's belief that civil society had a legitimate and important role to play in global governance.

Koh has subsequently assessed the legacy of Rio with characteristic honesty. On the one hand, he regards it as an "important victory" that "there's nobody in the South who would say, 'let's get rich first, and then we'll clean up the environment later.'" On the other hand, he has acknowledged the limitations of the Rio process and the slow pace of implementation. Of the Paris Agreement of 2015, he "saluted France for having broken through what was an impossible problem, and persuaded everybody that we are all in this together."

In subsequent years, Koh has described the environmental situation as "desperate, but not hopeless," reflecting his temperamental disposition as a "pragmatic idealist" -- clear-eyed about the scale of the challenge, but unwilling to surrender to fatalism.

3.2 Singapore-China Diplomatic Relations (1990)

Koh served as Singapore's Chief Negotiator in the negotiations to establish diplomatic relations between Singapore and the People's Republic of China, which were formalised in 1990. This was a delicate diplomatic exercise because of Singapore's multiracial identity and its determination not to establish relations with China before Indonesia did so (to avoid the perception that Singapore, with its majority-Chinese population, was acting as a "Chinese" state in Southeast Asia).

The Singapore-China relationship has been a recurring subject of Koh's public commentary. In a notable 2016 essay, "China's Perception of Singapore: 4 Areas of Misunderstanding," Koh identified four fundamental misconceptions that Chinese officials and commentators held about Singapore:

First: Singapore is not a Chinese country. Koh wrote that China assumes that because Singapore has a majority-Chinese population, it should naturally sympathise with and support Chinese policies. This is wrong. Singapore is a multiracial, multilingual state, not a Chinese state. Its interests are not identical to China's.

Second: Singapore values ASEAN unity. Any attempt by China to divide ASEAN or to deal with ASEAN members bilaterally on issues like the South China Sea would be regarded by Singapore as a threat to its national interest.

Third: Singapore is not a US ally. Singapore has good relations with both Washington and Beijing and pursues a policy of non-alignment. It is not a US ally. Koh pointed out that Singapore would not have been among the first to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) or supported China's Belt and Road Initiative if it were a US ally.

Fourth: Singapore has a small-state worldview. Singapore, like other small countries, wants a world governed by laws, rules, and principles, not by might or force. It supports the rules-based international order and the multilateral institutions that uphold it.

This essay was characteristically Koh: frank, precise, and unapologetic in its assertion of Singapore's interests and identity, even when addressing a powerful interlocutor.

3.3 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (2000--2003)

Koh served as Singapore's Chief Negotiator for the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA), which was concluded in 2003 and entered into force on 1 January 2004. It was the first Free Trade Agreement between the United States and an Asia-Pacific country -- a significant achievement for Singapore's economic diplomacy and for the broader project of trade liberalisation in the region.

The USSFTA negotiations were the subject of a case study at Harvard Business School, which analysed Koh's approach as a model of effective multi-front negotiation. The case study documented how Koh managed simultaneous negotiations with American trade negotiators, lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill, and coalition-building among domestic stakeholders in Singapore -- what Harvard's researchers termed a "negotiation campaign."

The agreement covered goods, services, investment, intellectual property, government procurement, competition policy, and dispute settlement -- an unusually comprehensive scope for a bilateral FTA. Koh's success in navigating the complex American legislative process, in which the agreement had to be approved by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, demonstrated his deep understanding of American political institutions and his skill in managing relationships across multiple arenas.

3.4 The Baltic Mediation (1993)

In 1993, the United Nations Secretary-General appointed Koh as his Special Envoy to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and the Russian Federation. The mission concerned the withdrawal of Russian troops from the newly independent Baltic states following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. The Baltic countries faced the presence of Russian military bases on their territory, as well as questions about the status of Russian military retirees and their families who had settled in the region.

Koh's mediation helped facilitate agreements between the Baltic states and Russia on troop withdrawal and the treatment of Russian-speaking minorities -- sensitive issues with the potential for violent conflict. The mission demonstrated Koh's capacity for shuttle diplomacy in an entirely different geopolitical context from his usual Southeast Asian theatre.

Koh later published a memoir of this experience: My Journey of Peace to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Russia (2024), which recounted his efforts to bring stability and understanding between Russia and the newly independent Baltic states.

3.5 The Pedra Branca Case at the International Court of Justice (2007--2008)

Koh served as Singapore's Agent before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case concerning sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks, and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore). The dispute, which had originated in 1979 when Malaysia first claimed the island, was referred to the ICJ by Special Agreement signed on 6 February 2003.

During the oral hearings in November 2007, Koh presented Singapore's case with characteristic precision. He highlighted "the constant stream of Singapore's acts of administration in relation to Pedra Branca, contrasted with the complete absence of Malaysian activities on Pedra Branca or within its territorial waters, and with Malaysia's silence in the face of all these state activities of Singapore."

On 23 May 2008, the ICJ ruled by a vote of 12 to 4 that sovereignty over Pedra Branca belongs to Singapore. Koh co-authored, with S. Jayakumar, Pedra Branca: The Road to the World Court (2009), which documented Singapore's legal strategy and the proceedings.

3.6 The Land Reclamation Case at ITLOS (2003--2005)

Koh also served as Singapore's Agent in the case concerning land reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor, brought by Malaysia before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in September 2003. Malaysia alleged that Singapore's reclamation works near Pulau Tekong and Tuas were causing transboundary environmental harm. The case was eventually settled by agreement between the two countries.

3.7 The ASEAN Charter

Koh served as the second chairman of the High Level Task Force that drafted the ASEAN Charter -- the constitutional document for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. This was another exercise in building consensus among states with diverse political systems, levels of development, and foreign policy orientations. The ASEAN Charter, adopted in 2007, gave ASEAN a legal personality and established institutional frameworks for decision-making, dispute settlement, and human rights.

3.8 WTO Dispute Panels

Koh has chaired two dispute panels for the World Trade Organization, contributing to the development of international trade law and the resolution of commercial disputes between states.

---

Part IV: The Public Intellectual -- Domestic Interventions

4.1 Overview: The Establishment Critic

Tommy Koh occupies a unique position in Singapore's public life. He is, simultaneously, one of the most senior and respected members of the establishment -- a holder of the Distinguished Service Order, the Order of Nila Utama (First Class), and numerous other national and international honours -- and one of the most persistent and candid critics of Singapore's social failings, cultural limitations, and policy gaps.

This is a deliberate and conscious choice. Koh has articulated his position with memorable clarity: "Singapore will languish if our lovers are uncritical and our critics are unloving. What Singapore needs is not sycophants but loving critics and critical lovers."

This formulation -- "loving critics and critical lovers" -- has become one of the most quoted phrases in Singapore's public discourse. It captures Koh's self-understanding perfectly: he is a man who loves Singapore, who has devoted his entire professional life to its service, but who believes that genuine patriotism requires honesty about the country's shortcomings and a willingness to challenge complacency wherever it is found.

Koh's domestic interventions have covered a remarkably wide range of issues: inequality and poverty, the treatment of low-wage workers, migrant worker conditions, minimum wage policy, the arts and culture, heritage preservation, environmental stewardship, civic behaviour, freedom of expression, Section 377A and LGBT rights, media bias, and the relationship between government and civil society. He has used every available platform -- newspaper columns, Tembusu College events, Facebook posts, conference speeches, CNA podcast interviews -- to advance his views.

What distinguishes Koh from other critics is that he speaks from within the establishment, not from outside it. His criticisms cannot be dismissed as the complaints of the disgruntled or the disempowered. He is Singapore's most decorated diplomat, a personal friend of multiple prime ministers, and a man whose service to the nation is beyond question. This gives his criticisms a weight and credibility that no opposition politician or civil society activist could match -- and it is precisely this combination of insider status and willingness to speak that makes him unique.

4.2 Inequality and the Social Compact

Koh's most sustained and passionate domestic advocacy has been on the subject of inequality. He has repeatedly argued that Singapore's income distribution is a "moral disgrace" and that the government has failed to ensure that all working Singaporeans can earn a living wage.

At the IPS 30th Anniversary Conference in October 2018, Koh laid out his position in terms that were unusually blunt for a figure of his standing:

"I think the current income distribution of Singapore is a moral disgrace. Many of our working people do not earn a living wage and live in poverty. The Progressive Wage Model has improved wages in certain sectors of our economy but the workers in those sectors still do not earn a living wage. Mr Lee Kuan Yew envisaged an income distribution which resembles an olive. Today, our income distribution resembles a pear."

The "olive" versus "pear" metaphor was a direct invocation of Lee Kuan Yew's vision for Singapore's social structure -- a society with a large middle class and small tails of wealth and poverty at either end (the olive) versus a society with a thin top and a bulging bottom (the pear). By framing his critique in terms of Lee Kuan Yew's own aspirations, Koh was making an argument that was difficult for the government to dismiss: Singapore had deviated from its founding father's vision of a just society.

Koh cited the United Nations Human Development Index, which described Singapore as the second most unequal high-income economy, after Hong Kong. He highlighted that Singapore was "not a classless society" and that its people were "divided by differences in wealth, income, careers, where they stay, and where they study."

In a CNA podcast interview in August 2022, Koh went further, describing Singapore as "a very snobbish and hierarchical society" that is "ruled by money." He elaborated:

"We are ruled by money, so we look down on those who are poor. We are also a meritocracy, we therefore look down on people who are poorly educated. And we have become very snobbish, we look down on people who can't afford to stay in private housing."

Koh was "sorry" to give such a description, but he was unapologetic about its accuracy. The statement was widely reported and debated, with some Singaporeans agreeing that it captured an uncomfortable truth and others arguing that it was an overgeneralisation.

4.2.1 The Minimum Wage Debate

Koh has been one of the most prominent advocates for ensuring that all Singaporean workers earn a living wage. His position is characteristically nuanced: he has stated that he is "not wedded to the minimum wage as a means to achieve this end," but that "every Singaporean worker, no matter what his or her job, has a right to earn a living wage, so as to be able to live in dignity and material sufficiency."

In practice, however, Koh has been a forceful critic of the government's resistance to minimum wage legislation. He has described the government's arguments against minimum wage as "fake arguments" and "the usual scare tactic." He has pointed to the experiences of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong -- all of which introduced minimum wage policies without the unemployment consequences that Singapore's government had predicted:

After implementing a minimum wage in Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea, these economies lifted "hundreds of thousands" out of poverty and enabled them to "live in dignity."

This advocacy brought Koh into direct conflict with senior establishment figures. In October 2018, following the IPS 30th Anniversary Conference, Koh posted on Facebook criticising the Straits Times for what he called "biased" coverage of the conference. He noted that the newspaper had failed to cover his rebuttal to Minister Josephine Teo's assertion that minimum wage could cause unemployment and illegal employment. He also asked why the Straits Times had not published photos of Cherian George, a prominent academic who had been effectively blacklisted by the establishment.

The ST Opinion Editor, Chua Mui Hoong, responded publicly, defending the newspaper's coverage and attributing the omission to space constraints. Koh replied that "biased reporting is a consistent pattern of ST."

Temasek Holdings Chairman Lim Boon Heng then weighed in, arguing that the evidence on minimum wage was "mixed" and that prescribing a minimum wage "may not be the best way." Koh dismissed these arguments, maintaining that the government's resistance to minimum wage was ideologically driven rather than evidence-based.

The exchange was remarkable not for its intellectual content -- the arguments on both sides of the minimum wage debate are well-established -- but for its demonstration of Koh's willingness to take on senior establishment figures publicly and to use social media to circumvent the mainstream press when he believed it was failing in its responsibility to report objectively.

4.2.2 Treatment of Low-Wage Workers

Beyond the minimum wage debate, Koh has spoken forcefully about the way Singapore's society treats people in low-status occupations:

"In Singapore, the elite does not show respect for people who work as cleaners, gardeners, petrol station attendants, security personnel. These low wage workers are treated as invisible people."

This observation is connected to his broader critique of Singapore as a society "ruled by money" -- a society in which status is determined by wealth and educational credentials, and in which those who lack both are rendered invisible.

4.3 Migrant Workers

Koh has been one of the most prominent establishment voices calling for better treatment of foreign workers in Singapore. His most significant intervention on this issue came during the COVID-19 pandemic, when outbreaks in foreign worker dormitories exposed the appalling conditions in which many migrant workers lived.

In April 2020, Koh stated bluntly:

"The way Singapore treats its foreign workers is not First World but Third World."

He pointed to dormitory conditions where "12 workers cramped in a dormitory room which is packed like sardines" in "unclean environments." He also expressed displeasure at the government's practice of allowing employers to transport foreign workers in flatbed trucks without any seats -- a practice he regarded as dehumanising.

This was not a new concern for Koh. He had long argued that Singapore's treatment of migrant workers was inconsistent with its aspirations to be a First World society. The pandemic simply made the issue impossible to ignore.

When a Lianhe Zaobao forum letter in April 2020 struck what Koh and Bilahari Kausikan both regarded as a "xenophobic note" in its discussion of foreign worker dormitory outbreaks, Koh commented that he "agreed with Bilahari and hoped that the letter was not reflective of the views of the newspaper's readers." This was a rare instance of the two diplomats -- who disagree on many domestic issues -- finding common ground.

4.4 "First World Country, Third World People"

At the Singapore Bicentennial Conference on 1 October 2019, organised by the Institute of Policy Studies, Koh delivered a speech that generated enormous public discussion. His central claim was that Singapore is "a First World country with Third World people" -- a formulation designed to provoke.

Key passages from the speech:

"I am more critical of Singaporeans than of the Government."

"Many of our people don't give a damn for the environment when they should. Many of our people are selfish and unkind. Just look at the way they drive."

"Today, Singapore is not a classless society. We are divided by wealth, by income, by profession, by place of residence, and even by the school we attend."

"Remember this: It was the angry voters who helped to elect President Trump in the United States. It was the angry voters in the United Kingdom who voted to leave the European Union."

This last remark was a pointed warning to Singapore's fourth-generation (4G) leaders: do not assume that economic success alone will guarantee political stability. If inequality and social stratification continue to deepen, Singapore could face the same populist backlash that had disrupted established democracies in the West.

Koh urged the 4G leaders to prioritise three things: racial and religious harmony, a more equal society, and environmental sustainability. He warned that Singapore had "lost its lead" to countries such as Japan and South Korea because "we've become timid and risk-averse."

4.4.1 The Five Tests

In December 2019, Koh followed up his Bicentennial Conference speech with an essay, "Five Tests That Singaporeans Must Pass to Be a Truly First World People." The five tests were:

First: Stop littering. "First World people such as the Japanese, South Koreans, and Taiwanese do not litter."

Second: Clean public toilets. About 70 per cent of public toilets in Singapore had received quality ratings, but the remaining 30 per cent -- found in markets, hawker centres, coffee shops, and some restaurants -- were "still very Third World."

Third: Civic-mindedness and good manners. Many Singaporeans had "forgotten how to say 'Please' and 'Thank you.'" When lift or train doors opened, some Singaporeans rushed in without waiting for those inside to exit. On escalators, some did not stand on the left to allow others to pass. On trains, some young Singaporeans ignored priority seating signs.

Fourth: Environmental consciousness. Singaporeans needed to take greater responsibility for environmental protection.

Fifth: Kindness and empathy. Singaporeans needed to develop a greater capacity for kindness, particularly towards those in less fortunate circumstances.

These tests were, by the standards of diplomatic discourse, almost comically mundane -- littering, toilet cleanliness, escalator etiquette. But that was precisely Koh's point. First World status is not merely a matter of GDP per capita or infrastructure quality. It is a matter of civic culture, of how people treat each other in everyday interactions, of whether a society has internalised the values of mutual respect and consideration that distinguish genuinely civilised communities from merely wealthy ones.

4.5 Arts, Culture, and "The Gracious Society"

Tommy Koh is, by the standards of Singapore's diplomatic and political establishment, an extraordinarily passionate advocate for the arts, culture, and heritage. This advocacy is not peripheral to his intellectual project; it is central to his vision of what Singapore should become.

4.5.1 Founding Chairman of the National Arts Council (1991--1996)

In 1991, Koh was appointed the founding Chairman of the National Arts Council (NAC). He has described the five years at NAC as "a happy period" of his life during which monthly tea parties allowed him "to get to know many artists and appreciate their struggles and successes."

As founding Chairman, Koh established institutional frameworks to support arts development in Singapore. He secured funding from the Totalisator Board for school attendance at performances, advocated with the Urban Redevelopment Authority for the allocation of vacant buildings to arts groups, and worked to create a more supportive ecosystem for artistic creation.

Koh's vision was ambitious: he wanted to make Singapore "the New York of Southeast Asia" -- a renowned collector and keeper of art from around the region. This aspiration reflected a conviction that Singapore's national identity could not be built on economic success alone; it required a cultural dimension that would give Singaporeans a sense of belonging, history, and aesthetic engagement with the world.

Koh has articulated the rationale for arts advocacy in terms that link culture to national character: art, culture, and heritage "make us a more self-confident, thoughtful and gracious people." The word "gracious" is important. Koh has long advocated for what he calls "the gracious society" -- a Singapore in which people are not merely efficient and prosperous but kind, considerate, and culturally literate.

4.5.2 The National Gallery Singapore

Koh was, by his own account, "a big lobbyist in making the National Gallery happen." He served as head of the jury panel for the museum's architectural design competition in his capacity as Chairman of the National Heritage Board. The National Gallery Singapore, which opened in 2015 in the former Supreme Court Building and City Hall, houses the world's largest public collection of Southeast Asian art -- a fulfilment, in part, of Koh's vision for Singapore as a regional cultural hub.

4.5.3 National Heritage Board (2002--2011)

Koh served as Chairman of the National Heritage Board for nearly a decade, from 2002 to 2011. During his tenure, he promoted Singapore's heritage, history, and arts through museum programmes, outreach initiatives, and the Heritage Festival. He also served as chairman of the Chinese Heritage Centre, reflecting his interest in the preservation of Singapore's diverse cultural traditions.

4.5.4 The Esplanade

Koh has served on the board of the Esplanade -- Theatres on the Bay, Singapore's national performing arts centre, which opened in 2002. His involvement with the Esplanade is another expression of his commitment to building institutional infrastructure for the arts.

4.5.5 Defence of Artists and Freedom of Expression

Koh has repeatedly defended artists and intellectuals who have been censured or marginalised by the government. In October 2019, during the Yale-NUS controversy over the cancellation of a course on "Dialogue and Dissent in Singapore" that would have been led by playwright Alfian Sa'at, Koh posted on Facebook defending Alfian:

"I admire very much his plays, 'Cooling Off Day' and 'Hotel'. It is of course true that some of his writings are critical of Singapore. But, freedom of speech means the right to agree with the government as well as the right to disagree."

He described Alfian as "a loving critic" of Singapore.

Koh also criticised the government for banning Tan Pin Pin's film To Singapore, With Love and for withdrawing book grants from Sonny Liew and Jeremy Tiang:

"The contestation of ideas is a necessary part of democracy. We should therefore not blacklist intellectuals, artists, writers because they criticise the government or hold dissenting views."

These interventions were significant because they came from a figure of unimpeachable establishment credentials. When Tommy Koh defends Alfian Sa'at or criticises the banning of a film, the government cannot dismiss the criticism as the work of a troublemaker or foreign agent. It must engage with the substance of the argument, because the critic is one of its own most distinguished servants.

4.6 Section 377A and LGBT Rights

Koh was one of the most prominent establishment voices to call for the repeal of Section 377A of the Penal Code, which criminalised consensual sex between men. His advocacy on this issue was characteristically evidence-based and legally argued.

In a 2018 Straits Times essay, Koh made four principal arguments for repeal:

Scientific evidence. "Scientific research has shown that homosexuality is a normal and natural variation in human sexuality and is not in itself a source of negative psychological effects." He cited the American Psychiatric Association's 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), and the World Health Organization's decision in May 1990 to remove homosexuality from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD): "Being LGBT is not a disease."

International norms. Of the 196 states in the United Nations, the majority -- 124 states -- did not criminalise sodomy. Singapore was among the minority of 72 states that did.

Separation of religion and state. Koh urged church and Islamic leaders to respect the separation of religion and the state in Singapore.

Constitutional argument. Koh argued that the Court of Appeal should overturn its 2014 decision and declare 377A unconstitutional, as it was "an antiquated law, not supported by science."

Both Tommy Koh and former Attorney-General Walter Woon called on members of the LGBTQ community to challenge the law in court.

Section 377A was eventually repealed in November 2022, though the government simultaneously amended the Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. Koh's advocacy, along with that of other establishment figures, contributed to creating the political space for repeal.

4.7 Environmental Advocacy

Koh's environmental advocacy, which began with his role at the Rio Earth Summit, has continued throughout his career. He has advocated for Singapore to become "a thought leader in the field of environment and development" and has criticised what he sees as the country's retreat from environmental leadership:

"The Republic has lost its lead to countries such as Japan and South Korea because we've become timid and risk-averse."

He co-edited Peace with Nature: 50 Inspiring Essays on Nature and the Environment (2023) with Lin Heng Lye and Shawn Lum, a collection reflecting his belief that environmental stewardship is both a moral imperative and a practical necessity for Singapore's long-term survival.

At the domestic level, Koh has repeatedly criticised Singaporeans for their lack of environmental consciousness, noting that "many of our people don't give a damn for the environment when they should." He has linked environmental neglect to the broader pattern of civic deficiency that he identifies as Singapore's central failing.

4.8 Birthday Wishes for Singapore

In August 2019, ahead of National Day, Koh published "My Birthday Wishes for Singapore" in the Straits Times, covering five areas: the economy, the environment, equality, justice, and democracy. On democracy, he wrote:

"We should strengthen the culture of respecting different points of view, including those with whom we disagree. This is the essence of democracy."

He called on Singapore to "accept the right of citizens to hold alternative/dissenting views" -- a direct challenge to the government's tendency to treat criticism and dissent as threats to social stability rather than as healthy expressions of democratic engagement.

---

Part V: The Intellectual Framework -- Key Concepts and Arguments

5.1 "Pragmatic Idealism"

The subtitle of Koh's 1998 book -- The Quest for World Order: Perspectives of a Pragmatic Idealist -- captures his intellectual self-identification. He is an idealist in the sense that he genuinely believes in the possibility of a more just international order, grounded in law, multilateral institutions, and human dignity. He is pragmatic in the sense that he understands the constraints of power, interest, and political reality, and is willing to work within those constraints to achieve incremental progress.

This pragmatic idealism distinguishes Koh from pure realists like Bilahari Kausikan, who tend to view international relations primarily through the lens of power and interest, and from pure idealists who advocate for principles without regard to feasibility. Koh operates in the space between these poles -- believing that principles matter, but that they must be pursued through practical strategies that account for the interests of all parties.

5.2 International Law as Shield and Sword

Koh has repeatedly articulated the view that for small states like Singapore, international law serves as "both a shield and a sword." It is a shield because it protects small states from the arbitrary exercise of power by larger states. It is a sword because it provides small states with legal instruments to defend their rights and interests in international forums.

This argument is the intellectual foundation of Singapore's foreign policy, and Koh is its most eloquent exponent. It explains Singapore's consistent support for multilateral institutions, the rules-based international order, and the peaceful settlement of disputes through international courts and tribunals.

As Koh has stated: "Singapore, like other small countries, wants to live in a world which is governed by laws, rules and principles and not by might or by force."

5.3 Singapore as a "Promiscuous" State

Koh has used the provocative term "promiscuous" to describe Singapore's foreign policy -- meaning that Singapore seeks to be friends with all major powers and to maintain extensive economic, diplomatic, and strategic relationships across the globe, without exclusive alignment with any single power.

This concept is related to, but distinct from, the ASEAN principle of non-alignment. Koh's formulation emphasises the active, entrepreneurial quality of Singapore's foreign policy: the country does not merely avoid taking sides but actively cultivates relationships with everyone. Singapore, in Koh's characterisation, is "friendly to everyone. We have good relations with all of them."

This approach explains Singapore's ability to host, for example, the Trump-Kim summit in 2018: "Singapore provides a very conducive environment to countries that have difficulties with each other to meet."

5.4 The "Small State" Question

In his essay "Is Singapore a Small Country?" (2017), Koh argued that the answer depends on the yardstick. By territory and population, Singapore is undoubtedly small. But by GDP per capita (PPP), Singapore is among the top five economies in the world. By the quality of its institutions, the sophistication of its diplomacy, and the reach of its economic relationships, Singapore routinely "punches above its weight."

Koh's conclusion is characteristically balanced: Singaporeans should be "quietly proud of achievements" but remain "humble and modest, never becoming proud and arrogant." In relations with other countries, Singapore should be "respectful but not submissive" while defending national interests.

This essay encapsulates a theme that runs throughout Koh's work: the refusal to accept that smallness entails insignificance, combined with a recognition that smallness imposes constraints that must be managed with skill and discipline.

5.5 The Asian Values Debate

Koh was part of what has been called the "Singapore school" of scholars and political leaders -- including Lee Kuan Yew, Kishore Mahbubani, and Bilahari Kausikan -- who developed and promoted the concept of "Asian values" during the 1990s. This concept was articulated most forcefully at the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna, where Asian governments challenged the Western claim that human rights norms were universal.

However, Koh's position within the Asian values debate was more nuanced than that of some of his contemporaries. He acknowledged that "the dark side of Asian values includes excessive materialism and inclination to authoritarianism" -- a concession that went further than most defenders of the Asian values thesis were willing to make. This acknowledgement is consistent with Koh's broader intellectual disposition: he is temperamentally inclined to see both sides of an argument and to resist the temptation of ideological rigidity.

5.6 The "Loving Critic" Framework

Koh's concept of the "loving critic" -- the person who criticises Singapore because they love it and want it to be better -- is not merely a rhetorical device but a substantive argument about the relationship between patriotism and dissent.

The traditional Singapore government position, particularly under Lee Kuan Yew and to a lesser extent under subsequent prime ministers, has been that public criticism of government policy is potentially destabilising and should be confined to "proper channels" -- feedback through MPs, the Feedback Unit (later renamed REACH), and establishment-approved forums. Critics who operate outside these channels have often been characterised as troublemakers, subversives, or -- in the case of foreign critics -- people who do not understand Singapore.

Koh's "loving critic" framework directly challenges this position. He argues that the most valuable critics are those who combine deep knowledge of and commitment to Singapore with the willingness to speak uncomfortable truths. He has explicitly called on the government not to "blacklist intellectuals, artists, writers because they criticise the government or hold dissenting views."

This is a fundamentally different model of the relationship between state and citizen from the one that has traditionally prevailed in Singapore. It posits that criticism is not a threat to stability but a source of strength -- that a society which cannot tolerate dissent will eventually stagnate, and that "Singapore will languish if our lovers are uncritical and our critics are unloving."

---

Part VI: Institutional Roles and Positions

6.1 Complete List of Known Positions

Diplomatic Positions:

• Singapore Permanent Representative to the United Nations (1968--1971, 1974--1984)
• Singapore Ambassador to the United States of America (1984--1990)
• Concurrent High Commissioner to Canada and Ambassador to Mexico (1984--1990)
• Ambassador-at-Large, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1990--present)
• UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy to Russia, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania (1993)
• Singapore's Chief Negotiator for the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (2000--2003)
• Singapore's Chief Negotiator for diplomatic relations with China (late 1980s--1990)
• Singapore's Agent before the International Court of Justice (Pedra Branca case, 2007--2008)
• Singapore's Agent before ITLOS (Land Reclamation case, 2003--2005)

International Conference Leadership:

• President, Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (1981--1982)
• Chairman, Main Committee, UNCLOS III (1980--1981)
• Chairman, Preparatory Committee, UN Conference on Environment and Development (1990--1992)
• Chairman, Main Committee, UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992)
• Chairman (second), High Level Task Force on the ASEAN Charter
• Chairman, two WTO dispute panels

Academic Positions:

• Assistant Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Singapore (1962--1964)
• Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Singapore (1971--1974)
• Professor of Law, National University of Singapore (1977--present)
• Rector, Tembusu College, National University of Singapore
• Chairman, Governing Board, Centre for International Law, NUS

Cultural and Heritage Institutions:

• Founding Chairman, National Arts Council (1991--1996)
• Chairman, National Heritage Board (2002--2011)
• Chairman, Chinese Heritage Centre
• Board member, Esplanade -- Theatres on the Bay
• Head of jury panel, National Gallery Singapore architectural design competition

Other Institutional Roles:

• Special Adviser, Institute of Policy Studies
• Founding Executive Director, Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) (1997--2000)
• Chairman, Censorship Review Committee (1991--1992)
• Panel of mediators, Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC)
• Panel of arbitrators, Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)

6.2 Honours and Awards

Singapore National Honours:

• Public Service Star (Bintang Bakti Masyarakat) (1971)
• Meritorious Service Medal (Pingat Jasa Gemilang) (1979)
• Distinguished Service Order (Darjah Utama Bakti Cemerlang) (1990)
• Order of Nila Utama (First Class) (2008) -- for contributions to the Pedra Branca case

International Awards:

• Great Negotiator Award, Program on Negotiation, Harvard Law School (2014)
• Elizabeth Haub Prize for Environmental Diplomacy
• Champion of the Earth Award, United Nations Environment Programme
• Multiple honorary degrees from universities worldwide

---

Part VII: Bibliography -- Published Works

7.1 Authored and Co-Authored Books

1. The Quest for World Order: Perspectives of a Pragmatic Idealist (with Amitav Acharya) (Singapore: Times Academic Press, 1998)
2. The Tommy Koh Reader: Favourite Essays and Lectures (Singapore: World Scientific, 2013)
3. Building a New Legal Order for the Oceans (Singapore: NUS Press, 2020)
4. My Journey of Peace to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Russia (Singapore: World Scientific, 2024)
5. Tommy Koh: The Extraordinary Life of an Ordinary Man (Singapore: World Scientific, 2025)
6. Pedra Branca: The Road to the World Court (with S. Jayakumar) (Singapore: NUS Press, 2009)

7.2 Edited and Co-Edited Volumes

1. The United States--Singapore Free Trade Agreement: Highlights and Insights (with Li Lin Chang) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2004)
2. The Little Red Dot: Reflections by Singapore's Diplomats (with Li Lin Chang) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2005)
3. The Little Red Dot: Reflections by Singapore's Diplomats -- Volume II (with Li Lin Chang) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2009)
4. The Little Red Dot: Reflections of Foreign Ambassadors on Singapore -- Volume III (with Li Lin Chang and Joanna Koh) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2015)
5. Fifty Secrets of Singapore's Success (Singapore: Straits Times Press, 2020)
6. India On Our Minds: Essays By Tharman Shanmugaratnam And 50 Singaporean Friends Of India (with Hernaikh Singh) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2021)
7. Peace with Nature: 50 Inspiring Essays on Nature and the Environment (with Lin Heng Lye and Shawn Lum) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2023)
8. 50 Years of Singapore and the United Nations (Singapore: World Scientific, 2015)
9. Over Singapore (with Richard W.J. Koh) (Singapore: Editions Didier Millet)
10. Asia and Europe: Essays and Speeches by Tommy Koh (ASEF, 2000)
11. UNCLOS at 40: Essays in Honour of Ambassador Tommy Koh (eds. Nilufar Oral and Penelope Ridings; with contributions from Koh) (various, 2022)
12. Singapore: The Year in Review (annual series, co-edited with various collaborators, Institute of Policy Studies)

7.3 The Tommy Koh Reader (2013) -- Contents and Significance

The Tommy Koh Reader is the single most comprehensive collection of Koh's thinking, assembled by the man himself from his "favourite essays and lectures." The volume is organised thematically and covers:

• Diplomacy and international law: Essays on the law of the sea, the Earth Summit, Singapore's foreign policy, and the rules-based international order
• Art, culture, and heritage: Essays on the role of the arts in national development, the case for public support of culture, and the preservation of Singapore's architectural and intangible heritage
• Nature and environmental issues: Essays on sustainable development, Singapore's environmental challenges, and the relationship between economic growth and ecological stewardship
• Society and values: Essays on inequality, civic culture, education, and the kind of society Singapore should aspire to be

The Reader is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand Koh's intellectual world. It reveals a mind that ranges freely across domains -- law, art, nature, society, diplomacy -- and that sees connections between them. For Koh, a country that neglects its cultural heritage is also a country that will struggle to maintain social cohesion; a society that mistreats its low-wage workers is also a society that will fail to live up to its international commitments on human rights; a government that suppresses artistic expression is also a government that will lose the creative energy it needs to innovate and adapt.

---

Part VIII: Relationships, Debates, and Disagreements

8.1 Tommy Koh and Bilahari Kausikan

Tommy Koh and Bilahari Kausikan are both Ambassadors-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and both are prominent public intellectuals. But their temperaments, intellectual dispositions, and policy positions differ significantly.

Bilahari is a self-described realist who views international relations primarily through the lens of power, interest, and threat. He is combative in style, dismissive of what he regards as naive idealism, and fiercely protective of the government's prerogatives. He has been described as Singapore's "chief naysayer" and has been involved in multiple public feuds, including a bitter exchange with Kishore Mahbubani in 2017 over Singapore's foreign policy.

Tommy Koh is, by contrast, a self-described "pragmatic idealist" who believes that international law and multilateral institutions can serve as genuine constraints on power. He is more conciliatory in style, more sympathetic to the perspectives of civil society and artists, and more willing to acknowledge the government's shortcomings on domestic policy.

The two men have clashed publicly on at least one occasion. During the controversy over Lee Hsien Yang's involvement with the Progress Singapore Party in 2020, Bilahari Kausikan launched a fierce social media attack on Lee Hsien Yang. Koh intervened publicly, asking Bilahari why he had "such venom" towards Lee Hsien Yang. This was a characteristically Koh-style intervention: measured in tone, but pointed in substance, and designed to challenge what he saw as an excessive and personal attack.

On the treatment of migrant workers and xenophobia, however, Koh and Bilahari have found common ground. Both condemned a Lianhe Zaobao forum letter in April 2020 that struck a xenophobic tone regarding the COVID-19 outbreaks in foreign worker dormitories.

8.2 Tommy Koh and Kishore Mahbubani

Koh and Kishore Mahbubani are members of the same intellectual generation and share certain institutional affiliations -- both are associated with NUS and the broader Singapore foreign policy establishment. However, their intellectual projects are quite different.

Kishore has built his career on making the case for the "Asian century" and for the competence of Asian governance relative to Western governance -- arguments most fully developed in Has the West Lost It? and Has China Won? His intellectual persona is that of the provocateur who challenges Western assumptions about the superiority of liberal democracy.

Koh's intellectual project is both broader and more domestically focused. While he has contributed to international debates about the law of the sea and environmental governance, his most passionate and sustained intellectual engagement has been with Singapore's domestic shortcomings -- inequality, civic culture, arts funding, freedom of expression. He is less interested in proving that Asia has "won" than in pushing Singapore to live up to its own stated ideals.

The two men do not appear to have engaged in direct public disagreements, but their intellectual orientations represent different emphases within the Singapore establishment: Kishore the external advocate, Koh the internal critic.

8.3 Tommy Koh and the Singapore Government

Koh's relationship with the Singapore government is a study in the productive tension between loyalty and independence. He is, by any measure, one of the government's most loyal and effective servants -- a man who has devoted his entire professional life to representing Singapore's interests abroad. But he is also one of the government's most persistent domestic critics.

This tension has occasionally produced friction. Koh has criticised government policy on minimum wage, foreign worker treatment, arts censorship, Section 377A, media coverage, and the suppression of dissent. He has done so publicly, in newspaper columns, Facebook posts, conference speeches, and podcast interviews. He has challenged specific ministers by name and accused the Straits Times of biased reporting.

Yet Koh has never been marginalised or punished for his criticism. He continues to hold the position of Ambassador-at-Large, to serve on government-appointed boards, and to be treated with respect by political leaders across the spectrum. This suggests either that the government values his independence and recognises the legitimacy of his critique, or that his stature is such that marginalising him would carry unacceptable reputational costs -- or, most likely, both.

Koh himself has framed this relationship in terms that the government can accept, even if it finds them uncomfortable. He is not against the government; he is for Singapore. His criticisms are motivated by patriotism, not opposition. He is, in his own formulation, a "loving critic" -- and the government, to its credit, has mostly accepted this self-characterisation.

---

Part IX: Key Quotations -- A Compendium

The following is a collection of significant direct quotations from Tommy Koh, drawn from speeches, essays, Facebook posts, and interviews. They are organised thematically.

On Singapore's Social Failings

"I think the current income distribution of Singapore is a moral disgrace."

"Many of our working people do not earn a living wage and live in poverty."

"Mr Lee Kuan Yew envisaged an income distribution which resembles an olive. Today, our income distribution resembles a pear."

"In Singapore, the elite does not show respect for people who work as cleaners, gardeners, petrol station attendants, security personnel. These low wage workers are treated as invisible people."

"We are ruled by money, so we look down on those who are poor. We are also a meritocracy, we therefore look down on people who are poorly educated. And we have become very snobbish, we look down on people who can't afford to stay in private housing."

"The way Singapore treats its foreign workers is not First World but Third World."

On Criticism and Democracy

"Singapore will languish if our lovers are uncritical and our critics are unloving. What Singapore needs is not sycophants but loving critics and critical lovers."

"The contestation of ideas is a necessary part of democracy. We should therefore not blacklist intellectuals, artists, writers because they criticise the government or hold dissenting views."

"Freedom of speech means the right to agree with the government as well as the right to disagree."

"We should strengthen the culture of respecting different points of view, including those with whom we disagree. This is the essence of democracy."

On Singaporean Civic Culture

"I am more critical of Singaporeans than of the Government."

"Many of our people don't give a damn for the environment when they should. Many of our people are selfish and unkind. Just look at the way they drive."

"Today, Singapore is not a classless society. We are divided by wealth, by income, by profession, by place of residence, and even by the school we attend."

"First World people such as the Japanese, South Koreans, and Taiwanese do not litter."

On International Law and Small States

"Singapore, like other small countries, wants to live in a world which is governed by laws, rules and principles and not by might or by force."

"To small countries, international law is both a shield and a sword."

On Singapore's Foreign Policy

Singapore is "friendly to everyone. We have good relations with all of them."

"Singapore provides a very conducive environment to countries that have difficulties with each other to meet."

On Negotiation

"Negotiation is both an art and a science."

"Preparation remains the single most reliable predictor of negotiation success."

On the Environment

"The situation is desperate, but not hopeless."

"Until the Earth Summit, there was no meeting of minds between those who champion the environment and those who champion economic development. In Rio, we managed to bring about a reconciliation between the two camps, with the unifying concept of sustainable development."

On the Minimum Wage

"Every Singaporean worker, no matter what his or her job, has a right to earn a living wage, so as to be able to live in dignity and material sufficiency."

"I aspire to a situation in which every working man and woman in Singapore can earn a living wage."

On the Arts

Art, culture, and heritage "make us a more self-confident, thoughtful and gracious people."

On Section 377A

"Scientific research has shown that homosexuality is a normal and natural variation in human sexuality."

"Being LGBT is not a disease."

Section 377A is "an antiquated law, not supported by science."

---

Part X: The NUS Scandals and Tembusu College

Koh's role as Rector of Tembusu College at the National University of Singapore exposed him to a controversy that was unusual for someone of his standing. In October 2020, Dr Jeremy Fernando, a former Tembusu College fellow, was sacked after two students alleged that he had made non-consensual sexual advances towards them. The case attracted significant public attention, particularly regarding NUS's 11-day delay in informing students and faculty about Fernando's dismissal.

Koh responded on Facebook, acknowledging that the university had been "wrong to delay informing students and faculty of the college about the case." When a commenter suggested he should resign as Rector, Koh initially appeared to offer to do so -- but backtracked within less than two hours, describing his earlier comment as a "joke." He then stated that he would abide by the sentiment of other commenters who argued he should not resign.

The episode was uncharacteristic of Koh's usually careful public persona. It revealed the tension between his instinct for accountability -- the impulse that led him to acknowledge NUS's failings -- and his reluctance to accept personal responsibility for an institutional failure that he argued was systemic rather than individual. Koh's substantive point -- that the system needed to change, not merely the individuals within it -- was sound, but the manner in which he handled the resignation question drew criticism.

---

Part XI: Assessment -- Tommy Koh's Place in Singapore's Intellectual History

11.1 The Paradox of the Establishment Critic

Tommy Koh embodies a paradox that is central to understanding Singapore's political culture. He is both the system's most accomplished representative and one of its most articulate internal critics. He has spent six decades serving the state -- negotiating treaties, winning legal disputes, building cultural institutions, representing Singapore to the world -- while simultaneously arguing that the state has failed its citizens on matters of inequality, civic culture, artistic freedom, and social justice.

This paradox is not a contradiction. It is, rather, a reflection of the complexity of Singapore's governance model and the range of views that exist within its establishment. The Singapore establishment is not monolithic. It contains realists and idealists, technocrats and humanists, defenders of the status quo and advocates for change. Koh represents the humanist, progressive wing of this establishment -- the wing that believes Singapore's material success is necessary but not sufficient, that a truly great society requires cultural richness, social justice, and civic virtue in addition to economic growth.

11.2 Influence and Legacy

Koh's influence operates at multiple levels:

International law and diplomacy. UNCLOS remains one of the most important multilateral treaties in existence, governing the use of the oceans by every coastal and maritime state. Koh's presidency of the UNCLOS III conference was decisive in securing its adoption. The Rio Earth Summit, while its legacy is more contested, established the concept of sustainable development as the framework for global environmental governance. These are contributions of lasting significance.

Singapore's foreign policy. Koh has been a principal architect of Singapore's foreign policy orientation: the emphasis on international law, multilateral institutions, and the rules-based order; the cultivation of relationships with all major powers; the assertion of Singapore's interests through legal and diplomatic channels rather than military force. His work as chief negotiator for the US-Singapore FTA and for the establishment of diplomatic relations with China contributed directly to Singapore's economic prosperity and strategic positioning.

Domestic policy debate. Koh has been a consistent voice for a more equal, more culturally rich, and more civically engaged Singapore. His advocacy on minimum wage, foreign worker treatment, arts funding, freedom of expression, and LGBT rights has helped shift the terms of public debate, even when it has not immediately changed policy. The repeal of Section 377A in 2022, the gradual improvement in foreign worker dormitory conditions, and the government's adoption of the Progressive Wage Model (even if Koh regards it as insufficient) can all be partially attributed to the sustained pressure that Koh and others have brought to bear.

Intellectual model. Koh has demonstrated that it is possible to serve the state loyally while maintaining intellectual independence -- that patriotism and criticism are not contradictions but complements. This model of the "loving critic" has influenced a generation of younger Singaporeans who seek to engage constructively with their country's challenges without either blind loyalty or wholesale rejection.

11.3 Limitations

Koh's influence, while substantial, has limits. His critiques of inequality, for example, have been persistent and eloquent, but Singapore remains one of the most unequal high-income societies in the world. His advocacy for arts funding and freedom of expression has not fundamentally altered the government's approach to censorship and control. His calls for a "gracious society" have not transformed Singaporean civic culture.

These limitations are partly structural -- no single individual, however distinguished, can transform the policies and culture of an entire society. But they also reflect the inherent constraints of the "loving critic" position. By operating within the establishment, by maintaining his government-appointed positions and his relationships with political leaders, Koh necessarily constrains the radicalism of his critique. He can call the income distribution a "moral disgrace," but he cannot call for a fundamental restructuring of Singapore's political economy. He can defend Alfian Sa'at, but he cannot challenge the fundamental premises of Singapore's approach to political speech. He is, in the end, a reformer rather than a revolutionary -- a man who wants to improve the system, not replace it.

Whether this represents wisdom or timidity depends on one's perspective. What is not in doubt is that Tommy Koh has used his extraordinary position to push Singapore towards greater justice, compassion, and cultural richness -- and that he has done so with a consistency, courage, and eloquence that few of his contemporaries can match.

---

Appendix: Timeline of Key Events

---

This document is part of the Singapore Governance Corpus, a research collection maintained for the purpose of deep understanding of Singapore's governance, policy, and intellectual traditions. It is a working document subject to revision as additional sources become available.